Wrecking herd immunity for the most vulnerable… good on you… Cause we need to get rid of all that dead wood… They are just weighing us down… Fuck en… right?

I wonder if we will see these long range systems equipped with several types of child drones… at least one anti radiation against AA and several others for independent targeting.

I think it’s more realistic that he is not there for “the people” but only a select group and he would rather spend his time with them getting donations for favors.

Geo guessers have been training these systems for years now. And they cannot even use metadata.

Check behind the see though curtain… billionaires pulling the strings

But all that fine money can till then be paid to the shareholders you silly goose.

With a pineapple 🍍

Haha… so trump started the ball rolling, then during the whole Biden period they litigated it all the way to the supreme court citing imminent danger to national security in many many words and these arguments where upheld on all levels.

And now all of a sudden Biden will not enforce this law leaving it to trump, and Trump will extend…

So not so imminent danger after all. If this goes to the courts again, the fact it can be postponed seems a good argument against the government case.

Edit: and trump started it, but the Dems will get to eat the blame for the ban… and Trump will be the hero for saving it… Rofl

Bonus points for first bringing all your points of sale down to skeleton crews first.

H1Bs are payed 40-60 cents on the dollar while you can work them harder and they can’t whine or get sent home… So…it does help the bottom line.

Making room for the new tranche of H1B coming in I guess.

Skynex

It’s also waste disposal of the blood, probably needs something special as normal Pfas destruction probably is not setup to include biohazard materials…

Still that pricetag would be insane if per person.

Banzai charges are really back in fashion. Maybe next they will reintroduce a modern version of the ohka

Wow, Straight to hell…

Guarding stuff at sea is actually pretty difficult. But in this case I feel terrorism is warranted. We can agree to disagree on the term used… since we seem to agree it cannot be ignored and stern action is needed.

If they use violence… but just sitting on an intersection can hardly be called violence.

Downplay it all you want, I think it’s pretty serious what they are doing and I think all vessels going in and out of lake NATO should be boarded and inspected and detailed tracked. I’d even go so far to require them to have a black box installed that real time reads out and transmits ship info. Turning off your black box or tampering with it means the ship is sealed and the crew as a whole is charged with a crime of tampering with the box. The crime is added to the law in each of the surrounding NATO countries and carries a hefty fine and seizure of the ship and her cargo. How’s that for political change under threat of violence.

People being frightened is not needed. If it aims to affect political change (which it does) through violence (which it is) it is therefore terrorism.

Why not? Using violence against civilian (infrastructure) to achieve political goals… seems to fit.

Sure you could argue violence… my take would be if you are using an oil tanker to drag a few ton piece of metal with the intent to break stuff… it’s pretty violent.