He gets a slap on the wrist and a golden parachute

If you are in it just for the art, Sand Land also has his art and is an ARPG (at least from the little I saw, I never played it). Not Dragon Ball, but might be interesting?

While I agree with the main message, I’ll be one to say you are a hypocrite. Code doesn’t have to be art for the use without consent to be wrong. Arguing that way is the same as when people say that using AI to generate images is fine because they have the idea but not the skills to execute it.

Either way you are diminishing someone’s else work because you find this tool useful to achieve the results you want.

No, I was not talking about the parry mechanic by itself, I was talking about how it overshadowed the other mechanics because of how strong it was.

But see, that’s the issue that I’m talking about. You say the game felt as a mix of rhythm game and pattern memorization. There’s no mention of the RPG mechanics there, because the parrying overshadowed it.

I wouldn’t say it was fine in E33. It was too strong compared to other mechanics, to the point you can pratically ignore making your characters stronger as long as you can parry perfectly.

It has, it’s called evil

Yes, that seems to work. Searching for doxygen and Lua also shows some plugins for compatibility, like this https://github.com/alecchen/doxygen-lua

Like Doxygen?

Do you mean like things like LSP and tags?

Here

zx2c4 pass

Slop kiddies, that’s what the developper called them

But the artist was supposed to pay in some form to watch these animations because they are not in the public domain

You misread what I said. If a game creator is using an LLM that was trained with art obtained without consent, that is, the artists were not compensated for that use, why should I compensate that game creator? They don’t value the works of others, so I won’t value theirs either

I pay for games instead of pirating because I believe that the people that worked on a game deserve to be compensated for their work. If these people are using generative AI that was trained with images obtained without the consent of the creators (and right now it’s very unlikely they are using ethically-trained generators), they are not paying the artists that helped create their images. Why should I pay for the game then?

I didn’t vote, but what does this have to do with privacy? That’s probably why people downvoted

Ithkuil wasn’t made to be hard, but it was made to express "more profound levels of human cognition briefly yet overtly and clearly’, and as a consequence became very hard

It’s an LLM. All it’s supposed to do is generate output that fits with the given input. There isn’t some logic in it that makes sending an email an error, or anything that enforces detecting any kind of error. You can wrap it in other tools for that, but there isn’t any indication that’s the case.

More than that, the initial post says the user found out about the email and then queried the LLM, so it didn’t detect anything. There isn’t any bug here, this is how LLMs operate.

Edit: here’s a podcast discussing exactly this: https://youtu.be/RoIjWGi-w5o?is=2ly14A2UdKalHuAH

Your response contradicts what you said before. If you understand that an LLM doesn’t know things, how is it interesting that it said that “it crossed the line”? Saying they crossed a line is a common response to being told they shouldn’t do something, so it’s natural that an LLM would respond that, no matter what it did before.