You see lying to yourself.

Why do you keep ignoring my questions? Why do you keep stomping your foot “no that’s not possible”. Why do you asininely pretend that you didn’t see 90% of the things I wrote.

Because you’re not trying to lie to me, but to you.

Prove me wrong and give me ANY explanation for those photos and what I’ve told you. Legal one.

But you can’t, because you’re a reality avoiding emotionally stunted person who wishes to live in their lintukoto (~lalaland roughly for our English readers).

https://yle.fi/a/74-20151696

It exists only in your head

I was born in the 80’s and all those gave me nostalgia.

Especially the horse shit. Mm. Rode a lot as a kid, and cleaned stables.

cigarettes and horse shit in the street.

In my memory that’s when I was about 7-9, rode horses. Dad smoked a lot.

cigarettes and bloody mud

That’s when I was in the army. We smoked a lot.

20s - cigarettes and bootleg whiskey

Dad also drank quite a bit.

cigarettes and dust.

15-16, driving mopeds and 125cc’s on dusty roads.

cigarettes and either gunpowder or a machine shop.

That’s the army again

cigarettes and gasoline.

Mopeds again

cigarettes and canned food.

Student times, lots of tuna and spaghetti and indoor smoking.

1980s - cigarettes and hair spray.

70s - cigarettes and alternating body odor and heavy cologne/perfume.

Mom used a ton of hairspray and dad had a really strong cologne.

“My face was eaten by leopards. What of it? They’re not dangerous.”

Yeah I think this is to counter someone selling theirs on purpose replacing it. Guess the number is just honestly an estimate of what could reasonably happen, but then it’s still 3 a year. But then again you couldn’t definitely have such bad luck to lose your wallet thrice a year.

Anyways, I’d assume that if (well before the US went totally mad) there was an actually reasonable case of someone encountering the limit who clearly wasn’t a fraudster, it’d probably be amended.

But that’s just my cursed optimism, probably doesn’t reflect reality.

Yeah that’s a huge assumption.

And I think they put it in there, because it’s a very conservative estimate at best and a gross lie at worst.

Oh hunny.

I’m sure there’s lots of things that don’t make sense to you.

Would you like me to simplify it for you, to make it easier for you understand, as it seems you’re one of the people who can’t control their drug use and may have actually fried their (already tiny to begin with) brain?

So you would do if for free?

Because you said you do that for a living. Meaning people pay you for the time you work on these things.

Have you any idea how costly that time is to your employer? That’s rhetorical, ofc you don’t.

Would you do go to work if it didn’t cover your rent?

You have admitted it does take some work. It doesn’t just happen, right.

So what is it you’re trying to say?

If he had your skills, he’d work for free? You would do the amount of work required, for free?

You’re just an arrogant dick who didn’t read the thread and said stupid shit. Simple as that.

Oh no, you’re just not reading the thread properly and going along with that other fool.

How about you actually read the thread instead of leaving snarky comments.

Children should be seen and not heard.

Oh they were, yes, you’re 100% correct.

This thread is about how people aren’t willing to cover the costs when labour is included.

Then you comment with “if he had more technical acumen, he wouldn’t need to do [the labour that people are unwilling to pay for]”.

If he doesn’t know how and doesn’t have the means to do something he shouldn’t be doing it. End of story.

He does know how. He’s saying he doesn’t have the means, because either he has to spend his time working full time, leaving no time for the labour people are unwilling to pay for, or people pay for the labour they’re unwilling to pay for, giving him the means, in which he will be able to do it, because he already has the knowledge.

Kinda how if someone gave me a huge plot of land, a quarry, and a billion dollars, I’d have no you’ve building a castle. But since I only know how to build one and don’t have the land, resource or time to labour a few hundred years building a castle bymeself, I’m not able to build a castle, but it’s not because I don’t know how to.

Maybe some reading comprehension or writing practice would do you good?

You’re saying he doesn’t need to do any work, that all thr work will just do itself, as long as he knows how it’s supposed to be done.

You don’t think maintaining a Mastodon instance takes any active input from the person maintaining the instance? Just knowing how to do it is enough to set up all the hardware and software required?

Sounds rather magical to me. Please explain

Haven’t had shrooms probably about since you were in diapers.

And I don’t drink liquor.

But hey, thanks for the input.

So youre saying if he just knew how to do it, he wouldn’t actually need to do it?

I know how to build a medieval castle with a moat and I’d have the technical acumen to build large sustainable hydroponic gardens there as well.

So why is it that I don’t have a castle, when I know how to build one?

Technical acumen?

You do realise things don’t happen just because you know how to do them? You still actually have to do them.

“Hey Randy, grab the bucket, someone’s had explosive diarrhea all over stall three again.”

Putting in a support ticket. “Flushing problem in stall two of the toilets on the second floor.”

So Randy doesn’t need to go through all the flushes to find the broken one.

“Oh c’mon man, it’s your hobby, right You’d do it anyway?”

Also, it wasn’t exactly just leftists, but also my leftist friends who were always asking for “friend prices” when I drove them around when I drove a taxi. Like… you guys are getting special service, and I’m your friend, you get to skip the hour of waiting and fighting other drunks in the taxi queue.

It also would’ve been different if there was the chances of favours in return.

So like people who could actually help with the labour or in something other way put in work, maybe they’d be okay with just covering the hosting costs, but modding a community isn’t exactly the same work as maintaining the soft- and hardware. Alone, I presume.

And also is the “hosting costs” just like the costs of the services for the hosting, or does it incorporate all the cost for electricity to run the equipment as well?

Is it lack of empathy or greed? I never really could figure that out. Feels like a bit of both.

I’m literally just repeating myself because of how obtuse and self-deceiving you are.

The Finnish aren’t the happiest country in the world by a mile, we have one of the psychologically sickest populations there is. And the endemic part is the ignoring of that.

Which is what you’re exemplifying.

You literally can’t propose a single legal thing that may have happened, you have no explanation, no idea, no suggestions, not even wild guesses.

The only thing you can do is stomp your foot while going "no no no no no no not true there’s no flaw in Finland. Actually, I even refuse to admit that I have the flaw of refusing to admit to faults by lying and saying I am okay with them while absolutely closing my eyes to the pile of shit that the government did.

You can’t give an alternative yet refuse to accept it. That’s known as a itkupotkuraivari, paskahousu.

deleted by creator

They do, and I’ve more proof.

You’re just too afraid to accept reality.

You’re not trying to deceive me, you’re deceiving yourself.

So what, I made those photos? Or you think it’s okay for someone to be deprived medical attention for days while under supervision for “their safety”? Or you’re just ignoring reality because you’re a paskahousu?

There are no other options.

Pick one.

You’re literally ignoring photographic evidence.

Delusions don’t get harder than that, paskahousu