No, they claim it is for a good reason to excuse it so they can get away with all the stuff they want later whilst hopefully (from their perspective) making more profit now. It’s the thin end of a wedge.

Stop defending corporations for anti-consumer behaviour. You do realise that YOU are a consumer as well, right?

That’s exactly what arbitrary is. It’s not for a good reason, it’s so they can push bullshit later. The limitations were chosen arbitrarily because they’re not real limitations, they’re entirely imposed by a Microsoft for their own ends. A non-arbitrary limitation is like minimum graphics card requirements for a game - won’t run without it. What do you think arbitrary means?

They’re not trying to get me to upgrade my OS, they’re trying to get me to buy a whole new fucking system for no good reason. Every last one of them can die in a fire.

And that’s before we consider that Windows 11 is actually a downgrade.

You’re missing the point. The return isn’t going to go to tax payers, it’s going to go to rich people, so it’s not a return, it’s just paying rich people who weren’t even involved. Enriching the rich like everything else the republicans do.

Yes. Of course. Because that’s what will happen, that money will go into improving services for the public rather than being funnelled into a rich pricks pockets. Totally what will happen, no reason to doubt that whatsoever.

America just deports you to el Salvador without due process instead.

I read that Palahniuk prefers the ending in the movie.

Isn’t the book super pro-fascism?

Terrorist means something specific until it doesn’t, at which point it can be twisted to mean anyone. Like people who disagree with and protest ethnic cleansing, genocide, shooting children, medical workers and journalists, etc.

Oh god, red paint on an aircraft, the terror!

Maybe learn about something before you comment on it?

Single player campaigns are literally the best type of games. Fomo bullshit, constant nagging to buy stuff, and relying on internet dickheads for the experience and hoping they won’t just grief or insult everyone the whole time is awful.

I actually didn’t mention my preference of web browser, I just commented on how obviously stupid you were being due to your being unable to decipher pretty simple comments. Interesting assumption to make though.

Removed by mod

Good. There were like six PS5 only games when they released it so I hope it does terribly - if you’ve bought one, you’re an idiot.

“Let’s just bleed em even drier” said Sony, careful not to cut its own lip on its vampire fangs.

You’re saying you think Trump will not only understand that and not insist on doing it anyway?

I remember the first time I found the woman with the crossbow, her model didn’t render during the cutscenes. I was assaulted and talking to a floating crossbow. It was definitely buggy.

The sequel’s issues were more down to a change in focus and tone though. The story in both is pretty generic, but I at least enjoyed the focus being the zombies in the first - that first night mission when you first see volatiles after destroying the antizin is terrifying. Finding the special zombies through story missions were always horrific enough. Night time in 2 was just fun run time.

The ignored cliffhanger from 1 was the zombies seemingly organising and communicating towards the end. That would’ve been more interesting than another zombified dude and humans are the real threat and all that. I just wish they stuck with the horror tone.

Dying Light 2’s problems go way beyond bugs, they didn’t understand why everyone liked the first game and focused the sequel on warring humans instead of zombies. Missed the point. They also made it way less scary and didn’t address the cliffhanger from the end of the first game.

If it quacks like a duck…

Go fuck yourself, nazi.