

deleted by creator
deleted by creator
no one said that
or maybe centrists in the USA be like
Ah yes, the classical “you’re either with us or against us”
This is false.
I feel like most people here are american, which would explain this point of view
Tankies are far left. You can go wrong on both sides. You could also technically go far right without being a complete dictature
Left and right isn’t as simple as “good” and “bad”
And the right is more than just conservatism and facism
That’s not what’s meant at all. The real thing is this one:
It just means that far left and far right are closer to each other than one can think, in the fact that they both lead to an authoritarian or totalitarian system.
It is obviously an over-simplification and inaccurate, but is mainly a way to criticize both extremes
I’m guessing it was made by someone who identifies as a Liberal, seeing as according to the diagram it’s the only correct choice
Probably. Being in the center doesn’t mean you’re correct, but yea, it seems pretty biased
The meaning of words change over time, that’s the same for “left” and “right”
You’re framing the “right” to rewrite the current meaning with the historical meaning, which just doesn’t work.
It scares me that there are so many upvotes on this. Misinformation is on both sides, and you’re comment is proof of that.
Yea, make your own opinions, and fuck everyone who criticizes a political category
Don’t let the downvotes change your mind. Lemmy is clearly leftist and you must not be brainwashed into changing your political beliefs to follow the mass. Keep your critical thinking!
that’s the free speech I want 😂
no need to be this mean though :(
if creator Eric Barone cared more about money, I can only imagine that a sequel would be all but guaranteed.
I don’t get this. A sequel means more money, as the current owners can now buy a second game
That’s not what I wrote
Also, please stop with the Mozilla praise
You seem unaware of the bullshit they do. They’re not clean at all.
I’d agree otherwise, else Coke Zero wouldn’t exist I guess.
Everyone cares for their health, they just think it’s “not that bad”, which it is in a way, but that depends on the level on health and risk you’re willing to have
The links I listed are only about the artificial sweeteners, not sugar-free sodas
But the main thing is: it makes you want more sugar, so you’ll end up consuming more, which doesn’t help or even makes weight regulation worse. You’ll end up getting the calories in a way or another, hopefully from good sources though
Nope. Vaping is so much better (less bad) than smoking. Combustion sucks.
I suggest you do your research.
What you sent is to prevent your ISP (or government) from correlating your internet activity to your identity
What I’m talking about is preventing fingerprinting or correlating 2 sessions to the same website (the entity that tracks you is the website itself in this case)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame
For transparency, here is another page that seems more in favor of Aspartame: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame_controversy
Here’s the conclusion of Yuka, which is a lot more on the “alarmist” side: https://help.yuka.io/l/en/article/r2x5e36paq-aspartame (note that the US FDA is considered as really lax compared to some other countries in Europe in terms of additives and health concerns worldwide)
Many studies show that artificial sweeteners doesn’t help with weight loss at all
Coke zero is worse for your health. Artificial sweeteners have pretty bad health effects, especially the one used in coke.
It is heavily suspected of being able to cause, heart issues, and having the counter intuitive effect to actually make your brain want more sugar, because the complete sugar activation mechanism isn’t triggered properly. It is also slightly suspected to cause cancer, although researchers don’t agree at all on this subject.
I don’t get how that’s relevant to what I said. That’s still something else
Your claim seems a bit BS. It was apparently to have a better distribution and quality.
AstraZeneca claimed not to get profits from the vaccine sales. This seems kind of fair knowing that doses were sold at about $4 USD (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford–AstraZeneca_COVID-19_vaccine#Early_development - https://reliefweb.int/report/world/uk-donates-20-million-more-oxford-astrazeneca-vaccines-countries-need)
Unless you’re talking about the side effects?