No. The less code for a given set of functionality the better… often. Removing functionality just to reduce code is daft. Otherwise stop adding any features. Remove all features of the kernel until machines only just boot. Lot less code!
But that’s true of all code in the kernel. If any change can break something then all broken bits will need fixing. Why not remove all drivers in case an update breaks them. Things can’t be preemptively fixed before breaking changes are made. A driver can be complete and only need updating if someone else breaks stuff, so leave it alone until then and only remove it I’d no one comes to fix it.
Removing functionality just in case is daft.
Why clear them out if they still work and are useful? Seems like a backwards step. What’s that phrase that people throw about:sometimes things are just done and don’t need changing.
Drones are piloted and controlled by humans, not AI.
I was meant to be Better FS, but it corrupted it to btrfs without noticing.
I think it has more issues than just with raid 5 &6!
I’ve never heard anyone say ZFS broke, corrupted their data or failed in any way at all. With btrfs it’s a consistent complaint. And btrfs literally has modes of operation that are known to be broken. I could understand if it was a new file system, but it can almost drink in pubs.
So, what you’re saying is, “it works on my machine”
I had almost exactly the same thing happen.
The whole point of RAID redundancy is uptime. The fact that btrfs doesn’t boot with a degraded disk is utterly ridiculous and speaks volumes of the developers.
You’re right to give up on btrfs. It’s been so long in development and it just isn’t ready. Ext4 or ZFS are mature and excellent file systems. There’s no need for btrfs these days. It always has and always will disappoint.
Everyone singing the praises of it are the sysadmin equivalent of the software engineer yelling ‘it works on my machine’ when a user finds an issue.
More widespread adoption of WKD (https://wiki.gnupg.org/WKDHosting) would be fantastic.
Not sure why I was downvoted for answering a question accurately.
I use an SMTP Relay for sending mail, so I don’t hit issues with sending.
I’m also using iredmail. Apart from it needing more hardware than it used to its been pretty stable. I use an SMTP Relay for sending mail, so I don’t hit issues with sending. Not that I ever actually send many emails.
No. I host Firefox that runs in a browser.
It’s one of my favourite things. So places that may block certain sites can be bypassed.
Opnsense
Vaultwarden
Home assistant
Emby
Gitea
Paperless-ngx
Firefox
I consider Authenticator Pro to be basically perfect
https://github.com/stratumauth/app