Of course it won’t… Did the screenshot I uploaded showing the same thing also not load?

What was the point of saying, “let me know if you see an ad” if you just ignore people telling you and showing proof that they’re seeing ads 😂 also curious why the “last week tonight” channel would not be monetized. I think maybe I’ve just fed a troll.

https://files.catbox.moe/eszql1.mp4

https://files.catbox.moe/eszql1.mp4

Is this good enough for you?

Edit: of the 5 or 6 times I loaded the video, it loaded once with no interruption, once with a YouTube survey, the remaining three or four all had ads…

What goalposts are being shifted? I replied to your other comment with a screenshot of an ad loaded in the video you seemed positive wouldn’t load an ad, what will it take for you to just admit you were wrong about a tiny, inconsequential thing?

Also:

Here’s an ad loading in before the video starts.

How did you find it easier to send this comment to every person disagreeing with you than it was to simply look it up? YouTube itself says they can and do put ads on any video they’d like. Even if everyone watched your linked video and didn’t get an ad (I got a YouTube survey) it would prove nothing, ads don’t show up every watch.

https://youtube.com/shorts/7uYr4m_yshk

YouTube has been putting ads in non-monetized videos for over a decade now, my channel from middle school would occasionally show an ad and we were too small to even enable monetization.

If it were a different color it’d be totally fine

There was also a series of videos at his own new house where he’s getting the LMG employees to work on things for him at his house.

Thank you for reminding me of another thing that put me off.

One of the employees that left is quoted as saying, “there’s a moment when you’re working on your boss’s third home when you start to wonder if you’ll ever be able to afford your own”.

That stuck with me.

You can tag on Boost for Lemmy.

Oklahoma City.

I find it interesting that the post itself has mostly upvotes, yet every comment I’ve made explaining why I don’t like it is downvoted

I’m down with the look, but cleaning does look like it’d be a nightmare.

Well, I wouldn’t say I’m outraged by it, given the community I posted it in. I’m not foaming at the mouth, I find the arrangement unpleasant and unnecessarily odd. Am I not allowed to think so?

They need a way to continue making money off PC players while we wait 2 years for GTA 6.

It sounds impressive to people who aren’t in the field. Like “scientist” or “doctor”. You might be really dumb but when you drop that title it tends to catch attention, warranted or not.

The pattern doesn’t go on for terribly long (you can see a break in the pattern towards the left of the photo, where there is actually a set of 3 aligned rows instead of 4).

They could have accomplished the same thing in a more uniform way by placing the tiles in the standard half-interval or quarter-interval pattern across all of them. The only thing that makes any sense to me is that it’s quicker/ faster to align the tiles than it is to offset them, but they couldn’t have them aligned the whole way for the reasons you outlined.

The every fifth tile is what I have an issue with, tiles laid out at half-intervals or quarter-intervals on every row are common and perfectly fine. The chunk of 4 aligned tiles is very unpleasant to look at imo.

The pattern is stupid.

It isn’t normal, and you trying to convince everyone that it is normal also isn’t normal.