• AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito dissented

    Well, no surprise there, even though their reason was that the decision is moot.

  • thekerker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have to say, I’m pleasantly surprised by this ruling. The way the court was leaning, I was fully expecting them to uphold the Independent State Legislature theory. And I’m extremely glad they rejected it, as it would have opened the door for MAGA-leaning state legislatures to unilaterally overturn their states’ election results, which is utterly terrifying.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the supreme court very much rules with it’s own relevance in mind.

      Too much fuckery and the party in power will start supporting things like term limits and court packing.

      There needs to be at least some fuckery, though, just to ensure the free yacht vacations and rent free homes for their moms don’t disappear.

  • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If in the last few months, SCOTUS wasn’t being delegitimized through solid investigative journalism by some members of the press that the right-wing justices would have been ruling in the opposite.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a theory going around that the main thing SCOTUS has been doing for a couple decades is increasing the power of courts over the other branches of government, and this decision is exactly in keeping with that.