fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agoDunning-Krugerlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square250fedilinkarrow-up11.74Karrow-down158
arrow-up11.68Karrow-down1imageDunning-Krugerlemmy.dbzer0.comfossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square250fedilink
minus-squareRowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·2 days agoYou can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.
minus-squarebountygiver [any]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 days agothat’s why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.
minus-squareEnthusiasticNature94@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·2 days agoExactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, “Well I have a PhD! Checkmate.” We’d descend into a dark age for science.
minus-squareEnthusiasticNature94@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down3·2 days agoExperts often disagree. If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn’t need so much research or so many universities.
You can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.
that’s why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.
Exactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, “Well I have a PhD! Checkmate.”
We’d descend into a dark age for science.
Experts often disagree.
If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn’t need so much research or so many universities.