fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoDunning-Krugerlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square230fedilinkarrow-up11.71Karrow-down158
arrow-up11.65Karrow-down1imageDunning-Krugerlemmy.dbzer0.comfossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square230fedilink
minus-squareRowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·1 day agoYou can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.
minus-squarebountygiver [any]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·24 hours agothat’s why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.
minus-squareEnthusiasticNature94@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·24 hours agoExactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, “Well I have a PhD! Checkmate.” We’d descend into a dark age for science.
minus-squareEnthusiasticNature94@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down3·24 hours agoExperts often disagree. If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn’t need so much research or so many universities.
You can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.
that’s why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.
Exactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, “Well I have a PhD! Checkmate.”
We’d descend into a dark age for science.
Experts often disagree.
If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn’t need so much research or so many universities.