• Thedudeofmanchester@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well that’s a bit vague, isn’t it. Doesnt provided any convincing information just that the previous club owner may have done something sketchy with the club’s profits. Some sources revealed Chelsea’s profits directly go to Putin’s pockets. How do this breach financial fair play? We ain’t doping the transfer market with state fund money. It’s just roman’s own business what he does with the profits how does that lead to point deduction after this whole fiasco

  • MealieAI@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    What’s new? Every couple of months “new” information comes out about some financial transaction that some club made. Football is a cesspool of secret money transfers and underhanded dealings.

    Call me when something concrete comes out or when a club is actually punished.

    • washag@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m not even sure these files were actually “leaked”. Chelsea have been reviewing the books and submitting opaque transactions as possible FFP violations to the PL since the new owners took over. Are these violations different from the ones that were self-reported?

  • WombRaider_3@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    They can borrow our trophy cabinet if the league ever does anything about all those plastic trophies they won. It’s spotless just like theirs was before Daddy Russia.

  • QuaintHeadspace@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    NOW they ask questions… not in 2004 but 2023 when the twat is gone… fucking media man asking the right questions at the wrong time just a casual 20 years too late…

  • The_Big_Cheese_09@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Is this any different than City taking ‘revenue’ from shell companies owned by their club’s owner? If nothing will be done to City for money laundering and stuff like that I doubt anything comes of this.

    And despite all of this, the Premier League will keep opening its legs to any shitty human with a lot of money.

  • ryodiUK@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I want them to get the Juventus Calciopoli special but we all know they’ll go ‘new owners mate, nothing to do with us’ and the EPL will happily forget about it.

  • gethatwearhat@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Why is it that teams like Chelsea and City can manage to do this in the first place, and then there’s no reprocussion discussions until a decade later?

    The FA, Premier League, FIFA - whoever, need to start being more proactive with laws instead of reacting to teams taking the piss.

  • lordtnt@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    oh fuck off. If Chelsea spent $10bil and failed nobody would care. Why the fuck clubs with little success can’t become successful? Who cares where’s the money come from? $1 biil to football is far far better than $1 bil to guns/rpg/killing children.