That’s not how supply and demand work. Low supply doesn’t drive demand higher; demand is usually independent of the supply. However low supply for any given demand will cause prices to increase.
And what makes you think the supply “artificially” low? There’s not a big conglomerate somewhere holding on to a large enough tranche of housing to cause a dip in supply, most likely.
It’s low supply because homeowners with record-low interest rates are less interested in selling and moving, since the monthly payment they pay right now be for less house. It’s a side-effect (or maybe the main effect? I’m not an economist) of the fed increases.
To take Manhattan as an example, 40% of the buildings could not be legally built today because they would violate zoning laws. A huge amount of San Francisco is under single-family zoning, and so low density - and given fixed land, low supply - is artificially enforced, which probably has something to do with it being one of the most expensive housing markets in the country.
That’s not how supply and demand work. Low supply doesn’t drive demand higher; demand is usually independent of the supply. However low supply for any given demand will cause prices to increase.
And what makes you think the supply “artificially” low? There’s not a big conglomerate somewhere holding on to a large enough tranche of housing to cause a dip in supply, most likely.
It’s low supply because homeowners with record-low interest rates are less interested in selling and moving, since the monthly payment they pay right now be for less house. It’s a side-effect (or maybe the main effect? I’m not an economist) of the fed increases.
I think they’re referring more to artificial restrictions like single-family zoning, setback requirements, parking minimums, etc.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/05/19/upshot/forty-percent-of-manhattans-buildings-could-not-be-built-today.html
To take Manhattan as an example, 40% of the buildings could not be legally built today because they would violate zoning laws. A huge amount of San Francisco is under single-family zoning, and so low density - and given fixed land, low supply - is artificially enforced, which probably has something to do with it being one of the most expensive housing markets in the country.
edit: removed off topic, added blackrock conspiracy video
Thanks for the input!
I have heard of companies buying up ‘would be first time buyer’ homes and renting them out.
Similar to this moderate random video on subject:
Why Wall Street Is Buying So Many U.S. Homes [12:33 | CNBC] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLsZlrZIFwU
The Blackrock Conspiracy Debunked [20:54 | The Hated One] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STYgeA9VScc