• desktop_user [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    126 months ago

    and all would generate the same if thrown to something capable of lossless e=mc^2 conversion (maybe a black hole)

    • @sga@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      86 months ago

      sadly black holes go to something like 42% conversion (source: some minute physics video i think)

      • @hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        That’s quite interesting. Is it because of the light produced when the materia starts spinning around in the accretion disk in very high speeds? I doubt hawking radiation would do anywhere near that much

        • @sga@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          https://youtu.be/t-O-Qdh7VvQ

          No, It is actually the light produced that we can actually use as a energy source, the limiting thing is, before completely loosing its kinetic energy to frictional heat, stuff falls into black hole, from where we can not get anymore energy back. If black hole is stationary, then its 6%, and if its spinning (and assuming the fastest spinning theoretically possible) - 42% (spinning black holes are smaller and have smaller radius of no-return

          • @hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 months ago

            Ahhh alright I was thinking the black hole converting mass to energy for itself, not as if we were to try utilize it