• gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      50
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ah yes, the millions of innocent palestianians that had their homeland taken from them and are now being bombed are literally just ask guilty as the people doing the invading and bombing. Very enlightened take.

      • doctordevice@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        141
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The problem with saying “both” is that there are 5 groups involved, maybe even 6.

        1. The Israeli government
        2. The Israeli people
        3. The West Bank Palestinian government (Fatah)
        4. The Gaza Strip Palestinian government (Hamas)
        5. The Palestinian people (arguably separate groups to account for differing levels of suffering and oppression)

        I’d agree that “both” are bad if you mean the Israeli government and Hamas, though to different degrees at different times. I’d agree “both” are victims if you mean the Israeli and Palestinian peoples, though undoubtedly the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip are the most victimized right now and in general.

      • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        My take is very simple:

        -are they actively targeting civilians? If yes then bad:

              -Israeli government- yes, then bad.
        
              -Hamas- yes, then bad.
        

        -are they following what is recognised as international law (namely the 1993 Oslo agreements):

              -Israeli government- while they formally recognise Palestine as a state, they have consistently undermined the Palestinian authority and occupied much of the West Bank without a plan for either self governance or leaving, settling parts of the West Bank aggressively, therefore bad.
        
        
               -Hamas- does not recognise Israel in any way and openly calls for its destruction, therefore bad.
        
        • datelmd5sum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t think Hamas soldiers are usually in uniform and Hamas bases don’t have signs saying “Hamas military base” on them. They couldn’t exist if they were easily distinguishable from civilians. Naturally Israel abuses this natural opposition to their oppression by escalating the oppression.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think the only reason Israel should exist today is that people already live there and it would be a mistake to force them out and create more displacement. That being said, Israel, a supremacist ethnostate, should never have had the right to exist… You shouldn’t exist if you have to build your fucking country on the mass graves of the native people, and then you are so deep in this shit you have to develop tech to be able to apartheid them all behind walls and systems and bullets, starving and dying. No, an entity like that should not deserve to exist. I still have hope that some reasonable Israelis will turn this all around, and Israel will stop being a genocidal mission.

          • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            The country Israel was founded by people who are native to the land. Perhaps read up on the history of the area, because what you are writing is factually incorrect.

            There was no country before and the area was populated by multiple different groups of people. Those people wanted to found countries in the area. There is war(s) regarding where the borders of these countries should be.

            That’s how almost every country in the world came into place. The only difference here is that it is taking place in a time when the whole world is watching in real time and people are much more globally mobile.

            I know it’s much easier and comfortable to paint a black and white picture of the situation, but it is just false…

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              If they were native to the land, how do you explain Deir Yasdin or the Nakba?

              • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                ??? What does that have to do with the fact that Israel is a country founded for people who are native to the land?

                • ???@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  If they are native to the land, why did they have to massacre (Deir Yassin) and ethnically cleanse (the Nakba) the other natives? 🤔

                  I’m asking because Deir Yassin is the massacre that eventually convinced my grandmother’s family to leave their hometown and become refugees in Jordan, especially after the men in the village tried to fight off these “natives to the land” because they were attacking and killing everyone. Deir Yassin convinced Palestinians that they couldn’t trust these “natives”, since they don’t stick to their treaties, and go around marauding.

                  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Jews were killed and oppressed in the area already thousands of years ago. How is that possible if they are not natives to the land?

                    For example during the Levant conquest or the regular and ongoing conflicts between Arabs and Jews in the area when it was still Transjordan? These conflicts are so fucking old they are mentioned in the Koran.

                    It’s nonsensical to try and claim Jews aren’t native there.

          • jasondj@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You shouldn’t exist if you have to build your fucking country on the mass graves of the native people, and then you are so deep in this shit you have to develop tech to be able to apartheid them all behind walls and systems and bullets, starving and dying. No, an entity like that should not deserve to exist.

            Just for curiosity, are you American?

            Because you literally just described America.

              • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                For that you know awfully little about the history of the area. Or you just love propaganda.

                • ???@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Yeah I fucking love all that “propaganda” from HRW and the UN.

                  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    The UN, which includes the HRW, have a historic bias against Israel that is an ongoing topic. They admitted so themselves in the past and have been called again and again to justify their strong bias that shows, among other things, in the fact they find the majority of all human rights offenses in Israel.

                    The focus on Israel from the UN stems form the fact that the majority of it’s members states are anti-democratic and their council is dominated by oil states and muslim states who see Israel as a thorn into their side.

                    While I wouldn’t call everything from the UN as propaganda, they are definitely not a neutral source for information.

            • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Because you literally just described America.

              Given what you know about our species and nature in general, what country in the world do you think doesn’t fit this description?

              • jasondj@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Countries still standing, flying (mostly) their original flag, with a significant chunk of peak territory remaining?

                Yeah, America isn’t unique. Lots throughout history. I guess you could say most of the new world, but certainly one of the largest…with Russia, China, Canada, and maybe Australia if you stretch the definition enough (and I’m not trying to ignore or dismiss their treatment of the aboriginals in saying that).

        • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          You missed actively using civilian infrastructure for military purpose, actively using civilians as shields, targeting of civilians, and hostage taking as international laws broken by Hamas.

          • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes I know, I restricted myself fairly, but outlining war crimes committed by Hamas would’ve been too long a list. Namely, not properly identifying combatente

          • ???@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s funny because the IDF did all of this just last week. All those Palestinians illegally detained in unknown locations: they are hostages, in every practical sense of the word.

              • ???@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                You’re right, they haven’t used anyone as a human shield yet after Israel had to make it illegal to do since it was a normal occurrence. Otherwise they did the rest it seems.