• LetsGOikz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe the Cuban president should ensure vital infrastructure can be maintained and holds an inventory of spares?

      Something that’d be significantly easier to do if it weren’t for the US’s continued immoral blockade and sanctions? Cuba does not have the resources to maintain the plant purely on their own, and they can’t hit a magic button that will suddenly let them find an abundance of spare tools and equipment to repair their infrastructure in a disaster scenario without wider access to international trade.

      • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are in trade with China. They can import what ever the hell they want. They did not import the components for the plant out of incompetence and are producing propaganda to deflect blame.

    • BunkerBusterKeaton@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      glad to see we have the history understander here!

      “hmm blockaded country that can’t import food/crops can’t feed their people. maybe they should simply grow crops and feed their people”

      • Fisting for Freedom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        The embargo does not block food and medicine goods to Cuba from the United States, and other countries besides the US trade with Cuba (notably, China). But apart from that, great point.

      • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As per the Reuters article I linked, Russia is their preferred trade partner and sent oxygen. Perhaps they should choose trade partners more carefully if they insist on relying on US components.

        I’d guess they’d get a lot more help if they held free and fair elections

        • BunkerBusterKeaton@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d guess they’d get a lot more help if they held free and fair elections

          Yes because THAT’S what the US cares about. Like supporting ‘free and fair elections’ by overthrowing democratically elected governments in Chile, Argentina, Guatemala, Bolivia, Iran, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Nicaragua…

          In each case they installed (or tried to install) a puppet dictator they could control. But no, please go on about how Cuba are actually THE BADDIES here.

          • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Afghanistan? Lol, the Taliban?

            Nice whataboutism though.

            It’s still more likely that the US would help Cuba if they introduced democracy

            • BunkerBusterKeaton@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh damn dawg, I guess you haven’t heard of the PDP before. All good, I gotchu

              https://www.commondreams.org/views/2008/12/02/afghanistan-another-untold-story

              Since feudal times the landholding system in Afghanistan had remained unchanged, with more than 75 percent of the land owned by big landlords who comprised only 3 percent of the rural population. In the mid-1960s, democratic revolutionary elements coalesced to form the People’s Democratic Party (PDP). In 1973, the king was deposed, but the government that replaced him proved to be autocratic, corrupt, and unpopular. It in turn was forced out in 1978 after a massive demonstration in front of the presidential palace, and after the army intervened on the side of the demonstrators.

              The military officers who took charge invited the PDP to form a new government under the leadership of Noor Mohammed Taraki, a poet and novelist. This is how a Marxist-led coalition of national democratic forces came into office. “It was a totally indigenous happening. Not even the CIA blamed the USSR for it,” writes John Ryan, a retired professor at the University of Winnipeg, who was conducting an agricultural research project in Afghanistan at about that time.

              The Taraki government proceeded to legalize labor unions, and set up a minimum wage, a progressive income tax, a literacy campaign, and programs that gave ordinary people greater access to health care, housing, and public sanitation. Fledgling peasant cooperatives were started and price reductions on some key foods were imposed…

              Because of its egalitarian and collectivist economic policies the Taraki government also incurred the opposition of the US national security state. Almost immediately after the PDP coalition came to power, the CIA, assisted by Saudi and Pakistani military, launched a large scale intervention into Afghanistan on the side of the ousted feudal lords, reactionary tribal chieftains, mullahs, and opium traffickers.

              A top official within the Taraki government was Hafizulla Amin, believed by many to have been recruited by the CIA during the several years he spent in the United States as a student. In September 1979, Amin seized state power in an armed coup. He executed Taraki, halted the reforms, and murdered, jailed, or exiled thousands of Taraki supporters as he moved toward establishing a fundamentalist Islamic state. But within two months, he was overthrown by PDP remnants including elements within the military.

              It should be noted that all this happened before the Soviet military intervention. National security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski publicly admitted–months before Soviet troops entered the country–that the Carter administration was providing huge sums to Muslim extremists to subvert the reformist government. Part of that effort involved brutal attacks by the CIA-backed mujahideen against schools and teachers in rural areas.

              In late 1979, the seriously besieged PDP government asked Moscow to send a contingent of troops to help ward off the mujahideen (Islamic guerrilla fighters) and foreign mercenaries, all recruited, financed, and well-armed by the CIA. The Soviets already had been sending aid for projects in mining, education, agriculture, and public health. Deploying troops represented a commitment of a more serious and politically dangerous sort. It took repeated requests from Kabul before Moscow agreed to intervene militarily.

              TL;DR: An organic, popular left-wing government deposed the king and made some serious reforms that challenged capital. Then – and stop me if you’ve heard this one before – capital interests and social reactionaries allied with the U.S. and its client states to attack said popular left-wing government. This pushed the left-wing government into the USSR’s camp (again, stop me if this sounds familiar) and it asked the Soviet Union for more and more help, up to and including military assistance.

              Now please log off, read theory, then come back and join the adults

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        “hmm blockaded country that can’t import food/crops can’t feed their people. maybe they should simply grow crops and feed their people”

        Why can’t they import food/crops? Do you believe that Cuba has 0 trade partners? Can you source any evidence of a “blockade” in place? I don’t recall seeing ships surrounding Cuba stopping all boat shipments. You realize that the last real blockade that was established around Cuba was dismantled in the 1980’s right? 6.6% of their current imports are from the USA. So not only is there no Blockade… but just an embargo… and not only is there an embargo, but one that’s so toothless that we are on their major importer list even though they’ve had decades to work without the USA.

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sorry? But at what point in my text did I deny an embargo? Leave it to a lemmygrad user to twist what was stated to a denial off an embargo.

            • Pili@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              so toothless that we are on their major importer list even though they’ve had decades to work without the USA.

              Right here my dude.

              Leave it to a lemmygrad user to twist what was stated to a denial off an embargo.

              “Your account is on an instance that I don’t like, so you must be arguing in bad faith”

              Always great to have a conversation with people who will reach for the silliest reason to not address the point being made. I know you have seen there was a link in my comment.

              • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Right here my dude.

                Yes the words directly preceding that were? You seem to have specifically ignored those words…

                Maybe you need help… so let me pull it up for you again.

                So not only is there no Blockade… but just an embargo… and not only is there an embargo,

                So I do acknowledge there’s an embargo. Not sure how you can claim that I’m denying there’s an embargo… Now come the question. What does that Embargo entail? Can you tell me that? Or are you just going to go on about how there’s a blockade like your fellow lemmygrad friend that claims there’s no Embargo, but instead a Blockade.

                “Your account is on an instance that I don’t like, so you must be arguing in bad faith”

                If I had a problem with the instance, I’d defederate it. I’m sure there’s plenty of users on lemmygrad that are perfectly fine to discuss topics with. And no, I wasn’t basing your obvious bad faith argument in the fact that you’re a lemmygrad user. However, it’s a common occurrence that users from that instance will argue in bad faith regularly. You fit the shoe. So I’m calling it how I see it.

                Always great to have a conversation with people who will reach for the silliest reason to not address the point being made.

                And here we go exactly my point. I DID address the point. You’re twisting the goalpost so hard that it might be a basketball hoop now.

                I know you have seen there was a link in my comment.

                The link is irrelavent because you made a claim that I deny the embargo. Which I categorically did not. You are effectively calling me a liar with a source that does not back up the claim. If you actually look up what the embargo terms are… Cuba cannot take or give credit to any US company. It also cannot operate in USD on the basis of credit to any other company operating in USD.

                What this means is Cuba CAN make purchases from the US as long as it has the capital. This is why US makes up 6.6% of Cuba total imports. Because Cuba CAN purchase stuff from the US. And does so quite often. Don’t believe me? here… https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/technology-evaluation/ote-data-portal/country-analysis/3124-2021-statistical-analysis-of-u-s-trade-with-cuba/file But this is the point of my “toothless” statement… It’s not a full embargo from the get-go. We DO trade with them. To me that’s a toothless embargo.