• Chup@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would not call that a U-turn:

    Instead, the government pledges to meet the 2 percent target on average over a five-year period, as already set out in the recently published National Security Strategy.

    Seems more like the same direction, just on a parallel lane.

    On the one hand debatable, as it doesn’t come 100% in line with the wording of the NATO guideline. On the other hand a practical course to measure across 5 years, as in some years there are larger procurements required than in others and overall the 2% are still met.

  • bouh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s going on in Germany regarding war and the army? It seems that when it comes to Ukraine help, EU defense or its own army you get an info one day and retract a few days later.

    • statist43@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      This article is from a bullshit magazine, its actually 2% over 5 years, so not a real change

      • Enkrod@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, this just allows them to spend more in some year and less in another instead of having to budget to a very specific point each year.

  • ebenixo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    The authoritarian pro military industrial complex block on lemmy is obviously not happy about this