So that’s actually a subtopic of WW2 that I haven’t dug into much - I know a bunch of the general economic context, but not the fiscal policies they were using to support their aims. Did the Nazis just issue shitloads of bonds and then say “yeah we’ll figure out the bill later, nbd”, or what?
You must be fun at parties
Literally anything about this regime:
____ wants _____, but doesn’t want to pay for it
Orangeboi staying true to form and leaning into the idiotic, inaccurate, archaic, and racist “lazy people of color” trope, I see. And on Juneteenth, too. I’m sure that’s part of the subtext he was going for.
lol wow, so that’s where Tom Clancy got that plot point for Without Remorse
Pretty soon they’re gonna need some level 4 plates to protect their narrow house majority
Lmao no fucking way, really?
The national guard is a meaningfully different organization than it was back during the Vietnam war era. And so is our society. I’d like to think that if Kent State played out today, we’d likely see a very different outcome. And at any rate, we’ll probably all get a chance to see what happen sooner than later in that respect.
All I’m saying is that if you are overtly friendly and inclusive to volunteer national guards[wo]men, it’s gonna be a lot harder for them to look you in the eye and pull the trigger. Up to and including refusing orders or fragging the officer giving the order.
🎶 take a look, it’s in a book, reading rainboooooow 🎶
You could ask ChatGPT, but that would be cheetahing
PEGANT
lol thanks, you made the BOTW cooking jingle play in my head
#FaithOfTheHeart
To be fair, it is understandable that a tropical dingdong would jump to the wrong conclusion there.
Oh, bless your heart. You think Congress is going to do anything?
Which Democratic senators would those be? I know the answer. But I want you to find it too, and realize why your comment is nonsense.
Part of effectively fighting this shit and holding Democratic politicians accountable is understanding at a tactical level when there’s even a fight to fight. This isn’t that. Lambasting them for a situation that didn’t actually happen (and I do mean this situation, not the others in which they did vote as you described) saps the power from criticism of situations that DID actually happen.
He did, in fact.