It’s all thanks to some videos from Inside Edition’s YouTube Channel.

All these videos Inside Edition posted are developing a question in my mind that’s getting the better of me: why so much hate on the female human - even as children? Like, why do they censor the little girl’s chest? Can’t anybody learn to appreciate the appearance of the female body? - Especially the nipples? And what’s the big deal with nipples? I’m just trying to ensure everyone is treated equally regardless of race, and gender… AND age (after what I just witnessed). And if no one’s gonna speak up about this, I might as well step up to the plate. After all, somebody’s got to do it!

It’s one thing to say a girl’s outfit or body is “too revealing”, it’s two things to photoshop out a girl’s cleavage to make her look “modest” for a yearbook or a portrait! But censoring a topless preteen girl who thought up an ingenious strategy to stay cool like her friends in the same stuffy room while at the same time not caring who’s around her? THAT’S REALLY CROSSING THE LINE! Watch the video on a 9 year old boy, Tristan Cook, saving the Tennessee family from a house fire and you’ll see what I mean.

That little girl made two non-verbal messages clear: one: if a boy can do it, then so can a girl! And two: no one is too young for anything! As long as you have the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to do it properly and safely, you’ll be fine. I was able to refuel my dad’s car and cook my own dinner when I was 6 all by myself and without setting anything ablaze by accident. All I did was copy exactly how my parents prep the work area before starting this chore!

However, when I try to illustrate with that video, even though Inside Edition is an official news channel, the responses I get back are rather bitter! They remove my post or ban me from the sites I post on for “promoting nudity involving a minor”!

WHERE

CAN

I

ASK

OR

SHARE

THAT

VIDEO?!

Due to my autism, I only know basic English. So I need to illustrate to get most of my messages through.

No one would answer! Not even the adult video forums that support uncensored nudity images would accept that video link URL! So I’m at a loss for words on what I just experienced! And after this experience, I have high doubts that ANY site will allow me to illustrate with a picture of the Napalm Girl (Phan Thi Kim Phuc) when she was 9, certain pictures of Pampers diaper boxes, Leela when she was an infant in the episode Leela’s Homeworld, or even those famous nude statues - especially Belgium’s famous kids: Manneken Pis/Jeanneke Pis. And I get Coco is a female bandicoot, but her angel death animation cued on most death scenarios completely ruins the fun of learning about the female body! Like, doesn’t anybody want to know why boys and girls exist? - Science-wise, that is? It’s almost like the mere action of thinking about this subject can get me in trouble!

But here’s a strange catch: sometimes on some sites, Napalm Girl is censored, other sites she isn’t. So I felt that I need to protest this; someone’s gotta speak up.

Speaking of which, I need to illustrate for the most part, but many subreddits don’t accept URLs, pictures, specific website URLs, or even a combination! So how else am I suppose to illustrate what I’m explaining - especially audio-based content (I.E, sound effects (E.G, Wood Single Piece Fall PE113701))?

I thought hard, I tried, and low and behold, they were removed hours later mainly because they “didn’t fit the subject of the forum”. Even though my multi-subject based thread does have some material relating to this forum’s topic. These sites and mods are all really stretching my problem solving skills beyond the breaking point for this one. Is there anything wrong with emulating something you see off of TV? Family Feud has actually inspired me to utilize this behaviour; I have a little habit of asking questions in the manner of a questionnaire or a survey. Mainly because, it’s like different people have different reactions to different foods; I.E, food allergies/allergy testing. And some of those answers will leave you speechless and your arms hanging limp.

I’m merely protesting with these pictures and videos as illustration. I’m not that good with words, so I need pictures to get half my messages across as noted above. There just HAS to be a website/forum or a program of some sort implemented to support “a little bit of everything” topics. After all, the more the merrier.

This is where I ask myself “NOW WHAT?!”. This can’t be one of those “exceptional” cases where they say “suicide never solves anything” doesn’t apply to these types of situations. In other words, all hope for resolving these types of situations really is lost.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    You are being removed for promoting nudity of a minor because that is what you are doing. Body positivity and adoring the human form are one thing. This is not that, and definitely not a good way to teach young people body positivity. You can do that without any nudity or references to genitals.

    • Cartoondude135@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Inside Edition is allowed to post that video and they never had any problems! Many have even agreed that topless little girl is a “legend”.

      That user’s comment got hundreds of likes, so I thought it would be ok to illustrate with that video as it’s something Inside Edition is allowed to show.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Look, a lot of us want everyone to be friendly and good and just. But its not that way. That video is getting passed around CSAM groups right now. Thats the world we live in. Its disgusting but its the truth, and this kind of shit just toes the line.