• 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m saying cops have a history and reputation of using force when it is plain not needed. They are trained to do as much. Then they use the ‘fear for their life defence’, because here’s the kicker: their assessment doesn’t have to be the least bit accurate.

      See for reference Daniel Shaver. Dude was shot and killed for trying to pull his pants up. Look up the body cam. The cop that shot him was basically exonerated and even managed to win damages for the fact that he shot the guy.

      • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I like the part where I never said otherwise, but you’re supplying single instances of police abusing their power.

        Just because some cop involved shootings are unwarranted doesn’t mean every cop involved shooting is unwarranted.

        Don’t get me wrong, I want major police reform like you do, but let’s not be disingenuous about the statistics.

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I like the part where I never said otherwise, but you’re supplying single instances of police abusing their power.

          I provided one example. There are hundreds upon hundreds of others.

          Or perhaps I should provide you links about how this is literally how they’re trained to operate?

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETf7NJOMS6Y

          But it’s not like I’ve been saying that cops never actually face threats. They do. But they treat literally everything as a threat on the off chance that they might accidentally be correct.