While Education and Organizing is building the parts for a new engine the rest of the year.

  • BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    You don’t have to if you live in a state that will vote overwhelmingly democrat. Maryland, California, New York, Massachusetts, Hawaii, and DC Biden won by over 20% margin I have wiggle room to vote 3rd party.

    • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      How many other people are thinking that same thing?

      There is NO wiggle room this election. Not even in blue af California.

      Save your principles for the local elections if you want future elections.

      • BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        In Maryland there is like 33% wiggle room I am ok. If I was in Pennsylvania it would be a different story.

        Hillary and Biden both beat Trump by huge numbers in Maryland I can vote for 3rd party no issues. People are just scared that people from Pennsylvania have the same idea which it would actually cause harm.

      • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Haha every election is THE MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION EVER NO WIGGLE ROOM.

        This election is equally important, or equally unimportant as any other election.

        • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Bruh. Before 2022 I had bodily autonomy and Trans people could receive their medications with a semblance of reliability. Immigrants weren’t being bussed around the country against their will.

          We have gone way more right, way faster, than I think anyone could have foreseen.

          • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            10 months ago

            Bruh. Before 2022 I had bodily autonomy

            If you’re referring to the lack of roe v wade, that was the supreme court, not the president, and I’m not aware of any current justices planning to retiring in the next four years. It’s now a states rights issue. Support the state level candidate who is inline with your views.

            Trans people could receive their medications with a semblance of reliability.

            With few exceptions, “trans” adults can do whatever they want. Assuming they’re an American citizen, they have the exact same rights as you and I.

            Immigrants weren’t being bussed around the country against their will.

            You’re right. They were piling up in border states and no one gave a shit until they started getting bussed around.

            We have gone way more right, way faster, than I think anyone could have foreseen.

            These issues are far more complicated than you would pretend.

            • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Who do you think stacked the Courts in the favor of Republicans? And if you think Trump won’t press it further by expanding the Courts and putting more Conservatives in, you’re high. Additionally, if you don’t think a Republican will push for a nationwide abortion ban, you’re even more high.

              Well, you’re worse than high. You’re likely a Russian troll.

              • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yep, I’m high, and a Russian troll. Ya got me :/

                Fucking online fear mongering. Honestly, I wouldn’t have it any other way. Feels like home.

                • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  You didn’t answer my questions about stacking the Courts or an attempted nationwide ban, you just replied with sarcasm.

                  Who do you think encouraged Greg Abbott, Ron DeSantis, and Mike Parson to push the fold on women’s rights?

                  Also, I live in South Texas. Please tell me about the “immigration crisis piling up at our borders”, before the bussing to different states. I’m listening.

                  • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    I’m allowed to respond with sarcasm. Mostly because I don’t take your fear mongering seriously. But as a courtesy:

                    There won’t be any stacking the courts. Stop it. Just like Biden was suppose to stack the courts. It was bullshit then, it’s bullshit now. But feel free to call gotcha on me if Trump wins and stacks.

                    What happens in a few states isn’t relevant to a “nationwide” ban. Trump is barely a conservative (he was a Democrat for much of his life). Abortion is a losing issue for moderates and left leaning conservatives. Many are in favor of some type of abortion (12 weeks, 15 weeks, etc…). Any conservative would be a fool to campaign on a federal ban on abortion.

                    Honestly I don’t care to argue immigration much. It’s not a issue in my state.

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Maryland:

      Hillary beat Trump 60 - 33%

      Biden beat Trump 65 - 33%

      I would argue that the folks who voted 3rd party in 2016 decided we needed to do more than just not vote for Trump in 2020. The folks who voted for Trump in 2016 and 2020 are gonna vote for him again in 2024.

      I’d say equally this year it is worthwhile to do more than just “not vote for Trump” but vote for Biden (especially if you intended to vote 3rd party … but by all means vote your conscience first!) to further cement the statement that we did not choose Trump.

      The stats show he lost no ground, the issue will be how much ground Biden has lost because of the attacks about their age and pushing folks to vote 3rd party or whatever as an act of protest.

      Vote your conscience first, but don’t protest by a third party vote. If you have no good option CHOOSE HARM REDUCTION ALWAYS

      I say this as a Bernie 2016 / 2020 voter. It still hurts. I’m choosing to reduce the harm regardless.

      • BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Hillary and Biden both beat Trump by huge numbers in Maryland I can vote for 3rd party no issues. People are just scared that people from Pennsylvania have the same idea which it would actually cause harm.

        • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          You can vote for whoever you please and should.

          Vote your conscience every time.

          I’m simply arguing that it is a good idea to not rest on your laurels and when we are faced with what feels like a crazy threat to democracy maybe then its especially good to vote in your best interests instead.

          Only you can choose what your best interests are, but anyone who argues that you SHOULD protest vote probably has an agenda which is likely to get you to not vote for Biden or Trump.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            harm reduction is when you know a bad thing is going to happen, and you give the people it’s happening to resources to mitigate the harm from it. needle exchanges are the best example: people are going to use drugs. that’s bad enough with the stigma and risks of impurities etc. giving them clean needles eliminates one of the dangers, though.

            voting doesn’t give the effected people any resources to deal with the problems created by our government.

            edit:

            harm reduction would be sending medical supplies to gaza. setting up abortion care resources in the states. distributing HRT resources. voting is just that: voting.

            • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Harm reduction, or harm minimization, refers to a range of intentional practices and public health policies designed to lessen the negative social and/or physical consequences associated with various human behaviors, both legal and illegal.

              It is harm reduction.

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                no, it’s not. harm reduction is the things you do regardless of whether democrats or republicans win.

                • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  I don’t want either candidate, they both suck to me. I’d prefer to not have to vote for either of them. I’d prefer to vote my conscience for policy.

                  Instead I am voting for the candidate who has not stated he intends to continue removing my wife’s bodily autonomy and push policies that will deliberately harm “the others” as they see them.

                  Voting for Biden, despite not wanting to and wishing I had a better option, is harm reduction for those I care about because if I didn’t act I was doing nothing.

                  and just to be clear, most people just do nothing

                  • Sybil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Instead I am voting for the candidate who has not stated he intends to continue removing my wife’s bodily autonomy and push policies that will deliberately harm “the others” as they see them.

                    same here. that’s why i’m voting for cornel west (or maybe jill stein).

                  • Sybil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Voting for Biden, despite not wanting to and wishing I had a better option, is harm reduction

                    no, it’s not.