GhostEye@lemmy.l0l.city to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoIL Supreme Court to decide if smell of marijuana justifies vehicle searcheswww.police1.comexternal-linkmessage-square36linkfedilinkarrow-up1167arrow-down12
arrow-up1165arrow-down1external-linkIL Supreme Court to decide if smell of marijuana justifies vehicle searcheswww.police1.comGhostEye@lemmy.l0l.city to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square36linkfedilink
minus-squareTelodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·2 years agoNo, a state court’s decision from a different state does not have precedential authority in the instant state.
minus-squareAniki 🌱🌿@lemm.eeBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·2 years agoThat’s not true at all. You can absolutely argue federal laws at the state level and use other courts rulings and precedent.
minus-squareTelodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoThe linked articles cover decisions issued by state courts. They are not controlling on other states. What exactly are you trying to say?
No, a state court’s decision from a different state does not have precedential authority in the instant state.
That’s not true at all. You can absolutely argue federal laws at the state level and use other courts rulings and precedent.
The linked articles cover decisions issued by state courts. They are not controlling on other states. What exactly are you trying to say?