• breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Surely allowing access to this personal data via a public API is a data breach? Its just taking it from something that shouldnt have exposed it rather than hacking into a system

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeh.
      Same as if it was a CSV mailing list on an unprotected URL or whatever.
      The term “data breach” suggests there was security there to be breeched. Maybe it needs a better term?

      • unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Data leak? In the security field, they categorize it as “information disclosure”… But it doesn’t have the same level of gravitas to it

        • db2@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          We have investigated this unintended information disclosure and have concluded it’s the fault of the users for having information.

          • unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Carries the same weight as “Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly”. It’s the fault of those little green men in kerbal space program.

        • lando55@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It does if you consider it from the point of view of a. Someone went out of their way to design this API so as to allow this or b. A team of individuals deployed it without realizing how it would be exploited

          You can generally learn things from a breach, but finding and remediating systemic issues like those mentioned above is a big ask

          Edit: I either responded to the wrong comment or misunderstood what you said. It’s late in the day…

          • unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you replied to the right post (mine) but I didn’t downvote you.

            Information disclosure doesn’t necessarily imply it’s intentional or unintentional, just that information was disclosed. But in a sense I do agree somewhat with that you said, only that WHO the person who developed the API receives that message from makes a huge difference. The IT security team coming to you and says “information disclosure” is scarier than a team mate

            • lando55@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh I wish that were true but unless GRC or Legal get involved nothing much comes of it lol