Elon Musk’s $56bn Tesla pay package is too much, judge rules::Judge ruled his pay – six times larger than the combined pay of the 200 highest-paid executives in 2021 – was set inappropriately

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 months ago

    Antonio Gracias, a Tesla director from 2007 to 2021, called the package “a great deal for shareholders” because he said it led to the company’s extraordinary success.

    Has this dude lost his mind?!

    • Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      I like the way he thinks. That you can string any words together and just say them and pretend they’re true. Imagination and creativity is important, people.

  • ALilOff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    I just read 1 article and didn’t dig too much deeper

    Over the last 4 years Tesla has laid off about 13,000 workers. If each had a $100K salary the cost to pay them all would be $1.3B.

    So his one pay package could’ve paid all of those 13,000 people for years.

      • GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh he’ll settle with the bank that ends up buying his sub prime debt. If you owe the bank 13 thousand it’s your problem. If you owe the bank 13 billion, it’s their problem.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A Delaware judge on Tuesday ruled in favor of the investors who challenged billionaire Elon Musk’s $56bn Tesla pay package as excessive, a court filing showed.

    Tesla shareholder Richard Tornetta filed the lawsuit five years ago, accusing the company’s chief executive of improperly dictating negotiations around the compensation package and claimed that the board acted without independence.

    Tesla directors argued during a weeklong trial that the company was paying to ensure that one of the world’s most dynamic entrepreneurs continued to dedicate his attention to the electric-vehicle maker.

    Tornetta’s lawyers argued the Tesla board never told shareholders that the goals were easier to achieve than the company was acknowledging and that internal projections showed Musk was quickly going to qualify for large portions of the pay package.

    The plaintiff’s legal team also argued the board had a duty to offer a smaller pay package or look for another CEO and that they should have required Musk to work full-time at Tesla instead of allowing him to focus on other projects.

    In July, Tesla’s directors agreed to return $735m to the company to settle shareholder allegations brought in a separate lawsuit filed in 2020 that they overpaid themselves.


    The original article contains 684 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!