I have seen so many times that systemd is insecure, bloated, etc. So i wonder ¿does it worth to switch to another init system?

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    It used to be that everything in Linux was a file, ideally a text file

    Yes? The entire Systemd configuration is done with files. With a very well defined structure called units that you can use to configure, boot, service startup, networking, containers, mount stuff, open sockets… that’s exactly the point Systemd provides a cohesive configuration file format for a system.

    • zkikiz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah but I’ve interacted with it a lot and most of my interaction is commands sent through one of their programs. Versus scripts like init.d whose contents I can easily inspect and modify. Init scripts aren’t config files, they’re directly executable code.

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Init scripts aren’t config files, they’re directly executable code.

        Yes and that’s exactly the problem.