The biggest impact you can have is reducing your consumption of goods. Making purchases last longer, skipping upgrade cycles, and in general having less.

Less manufacturing, less packaging, less shipping, less employees making goods commuting to work etc etc. However; that doesn’t really fit in with our current global economic survival strategy. Yes, less red meat is very important too, for the world as a whole.

I’m of the mind set of every bit helps, but it’s absurd the burden is always laid upon the individual and not those actively profiting from the destruction of the environment.

While I’m not claiming the respondent is wrong, can I get a citation for this data so I know who to try to work with to help reduce their emissions?

What does holding corporations accountable look like if not refusing to give them our money while advocating for regulation?

They pollute to make money on individuals buying their products and services.