Joe Biden and Mitch McConnell struck up a friendship during their nearly quarter-century in the Senate together. Now in their 80s, the Democratic president and the Senate GOP leader appear to be giving political cover to each other as they fend off questions about their advanced age and health issues.

Notably, McConnell, R-Ky., 81, hasn’t joined Donald Trump, 77, and other Republicans who have attacked Biden’s age, health and mental acuity as he seeks re-election.

And after McConnell’s second freeze-up last week, Biden was one of the first to call McConnell, telling reporters that his “friend” sounded like “his old self” and that such episodes are a “part of his recovery” from a fall and a concussion this year.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s so weird how everyone expects progressives to be just as hypocritical as moderates and conservatives…

        Bernie would 100% be down for it and immediately pivot to outreach or something else if he could hold office.

        He’s been saying he’s not more important than the movement for decades now

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m by no means obsessed with the guy, but one thing really solidified my respect for him: before I ever knew who he was he always would show up in a random documentary if US government was ever spoken about, and he was always on the “right side” of whatever the documentary was about. Then in the run up to 2016 he shows up and I’m like “holy crap it’s that guy!”

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            37
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            We need someone young and capable to rally behind, forget Bernie.

            Literally what Bernie has been saying for 20 years champ, glad you agree with him

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                What he said…

                Raising awareness for the progressive cause, and motivating the youth to participate in politics. Not just voting in the general, but voting in the primary and running for office.

                You’ve got really strong opinions about him, but don’t seem to know anything about him.

                It really seems like the two of you agree on a lot. You’re just really uninformed…

              • notacat@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                It is a failure of our system that a populist candidate without his name recognition would have no chance against the incredibly well-funded corporate shill neoliberals/conservatives we usually have to choose between.

          • Elderos@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            1 year ago

            About a hundred of his amendments made it in various bill proposal. A bunch of which became laws. You can’t really blame him for the broken party system in which he’s not even taking part. One man can’t single handly fix congress

          • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            1 year ago

            While I agree he didn’t do much from a legislative point of view, calling him a failure is missing the fact that he represented a voice that’s rarely heard in American politics, which might have paved the way people like AOC or Fetterman. Also the fact that he still holds the same views after 30 years is something that can serve as an antidote to cynicism. He’s an inspiring figure to many, and inspiration is important in politics.

            • sock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              1 year ago

              but he alone didnt change legislation (in a democracy) therefore he’s a failure

              • notacat@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes just like the anti-abortionists failed again and again until they succeeded in taking away rights. Building a movement takes time, especially if it’s not flush with corporate money.