• Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Except that 401ks are invested. By default they tend to be invested in a relatively stable, diverse portfolio along the standard long-term investment guidelines of ~60/40 balance of stocks and fixed or cash holdings. Mine made 15% last year invested even more conservatively than that, and it’s a no-name 401k provides by my small employer. I would have made significantly less with gold.

    If you think people’s 401ks are just sitting there in a low-interest checking account, I don’t think you understand how they’re actually structured.

    • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh, I understand. I get that the money is invested in things that will grow over time, but you’re still having to take risk in order to get that return. Otherwise, what happens is you lose your money to inflation. At least with gold, it’s a steady rise and will not fluctuate a whole lot. Gold holds your purchasing power with very little risk at all.

      • Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’d find very few financial advisors or experts who would recommend putting your retirement portfolio entirely in gold.