• samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Could he stop sending them weapons if he wanted? Obviously he’s fine with it, but if he weren’t, can the President alone actually stop something like that?

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Even President Sanders wouldn’t have been able to stop the US government from being complicit, then. But at least he wouldn’t have supported it.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            the bill to force his hand hasn’t gone any further than the House of Representatives. Schumer says he’s not gonna let it come to the senate floor for a vote. Who is forcing Biden to sell Netanyahu weapons?

            • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              They don’t have to pass a bill to do that. Biden can’t block sales over a certain amount, which is why he could only delay the most recent one.

                • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Legally, the U.S. can’t cut Israel off completely. Since 2008, the U.S. has had to weigh all arms sales to Israel and other countries in the region against the requirement that Israel maintains a “qualitative military edge” against all enemies, both state and non-state actors.

                  The Biden administration in late April decided to pause a shipment of 3,500 “dumb” — aka, unguided — munitions that officials expected Israel to use in Rafah: 1,800 of those were 2,000-pound bombs and 1,700 of those were 500-pound bombs. U.S. officials were particularly concerned about the 2,000-pound bombs and the impact the massive weapon would have in a dense urban setting.

                  In announcing the pause, Biden for the first time acknowledged that civilians had been killed by these weapons in Gaza.

                  “Civilians have been killed in Gaza as a consequence of those bombs and other ways in which they go after population centers,” Biden said on CNN, referring to 2,000-pound bomb. “I’ve made it clear to Bibi and the war cabinet: They’re not going to get our support, if in fact they go on these population centers.”

                  The bombs were approved by Congress in 2021. They had been licensed by the administration, manufactured, and ready to be shipped when the order came down to pause the movement.

                  https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/15/biden-israel-weapons-policy-00158210

    • Gluten6970@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Without American support there would be no Israel. They are a vassal state.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        A vassal state that has the US by the balls, apparently, since they do whatever the fuck they want.

        • Gluten6970@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You are incredibly naive if you think “my red line is Rafah” is anything more than performance. There is no one being held by the balls; the American government is literally funding the genocide.

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            How is the performance supposed to benefit him? As soon as the “red line” is crossed and nothing happens, it makes him seem weak. Usually when being performative, you say something that has a plausible excuse when it doesn’t happen - or something that can’t be acted on until you’re elected. This was very poorly conceived, then.

            • Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              The goal might be to seem weak. His campaign strategists are probably telling him that being weak will net him more democratic voters than not laying down a fake red line and seeming evil.