I get where your coming from, but this seems like it can elevate fringe opinions too much. It’s like when news stations felt that they needed to air both sides of every issue, so even though 99% of scientists said that humans were contributing to climate change, the stations would have one of the 99% and one of the 1% who disagreed, and the public would get the impression that science was divided on the issue.
I get where your coming from, but this seems like it can elevate fringe opinions too much. It’s like when news stations felt that they needed to air both sides of every issue, so even though 99% of scientists said that humans were contributing to climate change, the stations would have one of the 99% and one of the 1% who disagreed, and the public would get the impression that science was divided on the issue.