• a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    They accuse them of bad journalism. Supposing intent you can’t prove is the definition of bad journalism. People need to temper their instinctual emotions a bit. I’m upset about Trump being a serial liar too (which I can say, because I’m a nobody who can totally infer his intent) but cmon, can we not leave the very foundations of factual journalism in the dust in our quest to right that wrong?

      • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why does journalism need to spoonfeed people? Why can’t we take accountability? They report the facts. Facts are provable, with evidence. You can only very, very rarely prove intent with evidence. A lie is an untruth delivered with intent. They cannot prove that and as such should not report it. We, as readers, should then piece the facts together. They’re giving you facts, not teaching you how to think. It’s not their job.

        • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Because most people are NPCs. They’ve been spoonfed their information for a century, and before that they just knew nothing. There has never been, and likely never will be, a period in history where the average person actually is an independent rational actor. Most people are proles