• RadicalCandour@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    To add to this, A lot of gorillas that are saved from unsafe/illegal conditions cannot go back into the wild. Places like The Rotterdam zoo provides a lot of enrichment for these animals that you won’t see at say, Joe’s roadside animal park.

    • rah@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why not save animals from unsafe/illegal conditions and provide enrichment, without turning the animals into an attraction?

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Because people wouldn’t support spending their taxes on it without making them aware of the value. Which is done by educating them.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Because the attraction rallies support for preserving and protecting their natural habitat. Zoos act as promotional centers for conservation.

        • rah@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Zoos act as promotional centers for conservation.

          But they aren’t necessary for conservation. Conservation can occur without zoos.

          • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I love when people like you suddenly come up with a hot take that absolutely no one has ever thought through ever in the past hundreds of years.

          • Liz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes, but conservation is not a binary condition. Zoos are responsible for more conservation than we would otherwise have without them.

            • rah@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              So you acknowledge that zoos are not necessary for conservation?

              • Liz@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Not in a binary sense, no. Such thinking isn’t useful, however. Zoos are a very strong net good fot animals, with minimal downsides (assuming the zoo keepers aren’t calloused assholes).