Portland, Oregon The U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 28 in a landmark case that local government ordinances with civil and criminal penalties for camping on public land do not constitute cruel and unusual punishment of homeless people. Just three days later on July 1, the ruling went into effect.

Homelessness has been increasing exponentially in Oregon since the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent cost-of-living crises. There are not enough accommodations for the large homeless population, and as a result unsheltered homelessness is the fastest growing form of homelessness in Oregon.

According to local independent news sources, the unsheltered homeless population in Oregon believes that liberal politicians and charities have failed them repeatedly. There is nowhere for the unsheltered homeless to sleep in Grants Pass without being fined or incarcerated. This ruling further entraps the homeless in a cycle of debt and/or incarceration, making it harder for them to find employment and housing. Most low-cost housing has restrictions against people with arrest records.

A Portland political activist who is a case manager for homeless people and asylum seekers revealed that management has not responded to the court ruling or made any plans to meet this new demand. It is difficult to discern how the sheltered clients at this facility are feeling about the ruling as they are reluctant to discuss political matters with staff.

The precedent from this ruling has yet to affect other cities in Oregon, but it remains unclear how larger cities like Portland will react to this ruling.

The results of Johnson v. Grants Pass further demonstrate that bourgeois philanthropy and reform, while postponing the miseries caused by private ownership of housing, fail to solve the underlying problem.

  • Camarada Forte@lemmygrad.ml
    14·
    4 months ago

    Basically modern “vagrancy laws” and slavery. In US the incarcerated population also serves as a source of cheap labor, which might be the reasoning behind these laws

    • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
      17·
      4 months ago

      Marxist theory on the underclass suggests that the ruling class actually need a large class of underclass, unemployed homeless people. They serve a lot of functions for the upper class; slave labour, downward pressure on wages and working conditions, downward pressure on living standards, upward pressure on rent as housing becomes artifically unavilable to them.

      Lastly it pits the working class against those underneath them as they literally fight each other for resources and survival. Its always a function, not a mistake that people are poor.

      • Camarada Forte@lemmygrad.ml
        5·
        4 months ago

        Marxist theory on the underclass suggests that the ruling class actually need a large class of underclass, unemployed homeless people.

        They are arresting them. The US prison system employs prison labor for profit. This essentially makes them “employed” and “sheltered”.
        It’s a drive for profit and capital accumulation, using prison labor to maintain profit rates.

        The Supreme Court on Friday sided with a small Oregon town that imposes civil punishments on homeless people for sleeping in public spaces, finding that enforcement of its anti-camping rules is not prohibited by the Eighth Amendment’s protections from cruel and unusual punishment.

        The 6-3 decision from the court in the case known as City of Grants Pass v. Johnson is its most significant involving homelessness in decades. It comes as cities nationwide grapple with a spike in the number of people without access to shelter, driven in part by high housing costs and the end of aid programs launched in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.