If you scroll up you will see the other person referred to AIPAC as the Israeli government and claimed they were funding the whole operation.
I pointed out that what they were saying was incorrect. It appears you and i are in agreement here and your comment was meant for the person you thought you were defending.
Given the context that you are responding to a previous conversation, arguing with me doesn’t really make sense unless you were defending the other position.
So if you aren’t defending them, what is it that you are trying to do?
This was you yeah?
I understand the confusion now.
If you scroll up you will see the other person referred to AIPAC as the Israeli government and claimed they were funding the whole operation.
I pointed out that what they were saying was incorrect. It appears you and i are in agreement here and your comment was meant for the person you thought you were defending.
No. Nobody believes AIPAC’s donating members are working for Israel. That’s entirely your fiction.
The person you are defending doesn’t believe the 3 million members of AIPAC are donors. They stated that Israel is funding the entire operation.
When I told them that was not the case, they stated I was brainwashed into holding antisemitic beliefs by AIPAC, and therefore by Israel.
Quick question, my maggot friend: why are you defending somebody if you don’t even understand what it is they said?
And you think they operate solely off donations from those members? I don’t think they do.
100% of their funding is what the person you are defending said.
I’m still not defending anyone.
Given the context that you are responding to a previous conversation, arguing with me doesn’t really make sense unless you were defending the other position.
So if you aren’t defending them, what is it that you are trying to do?
Point out how twisted you have your thinking.