rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 个月前Rustulesh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1255arrow-down10
arrow-up1255arrow-down1external-linkRustulesh.itjust.worksrambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 个月前message-square24fedilink
minus-squarePlop@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 个月前Const generics are already stable. Do you mean const inline or const expressions on type level?
minus-squareGinny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 个月前Sorry, I was thinking of other features covered by the Const Generics Project Group, like generic_const_exprs.
minus-squarePlop@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 个月前Has there been any progress on that? The projects repo seems somewhat dead.
minus-squareGinny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 个月前There seems to be a couple of people keeping the lights on at the project zulip but they are presumably busy with other things.
minus-squarePlop@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 个月前Ah okay! Would love to see a stable generic_const_expr one day.
Const generics are already stable. Do you mean const inline or const expressions on type level?
Sorry, I was thinking of other features covered by the Const Generics Project Group, like generic_const_exprs.
Has there been any progress on that? The projects repo seems somewhat dead.
There seems to be a couple of people keeping the lights on at the project zulip but they are presumably busy with other things.
Ah okay! Would love to see a stable generic_const_expr one day.