• Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    $140 a month is well below the reported average EV loan payment. And to make up a $10k price difference you’d need no payment, no repairs, and about 70 months to just break even.

    Arguing for EVs based on economics isn’t the best argument to make. They are more enjoyable, they pollute less if they’re used for 10 years, mining and recycling lithium is vastly superior to drilling, refining, and burning petroleum, charging at home over night is a massive benefit. But the economics aren’t there yet.

    • Paralda@programming.dev
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wasn’t saying it is, but it can make a difference.

      If you’re in the price point anyway, I think an EV is a no brainer. Why get a $50k BMW over a $50k EV? If you’re shopping for a $15k or less car, then yeah, it’s not easy to justify.

      But used Model 3’s are going for $30k now, and you can get a $4k tax credit on top of that. Saving an additional $140/mo makes it competitive with a lot of mid priced cars.

      • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why get a $50k BMW over a $50k EV?

        Because a $50k BMW is going to be much better equipped than a $50k EV. That comparison isn’t a good one to make, because a $50k EV right now would be equipment equivalent for a $30-40k ICE vehicle.

        Again the economics aren’t there. A $30k used Model 3 with its creaking suspension and beaten interior would need to compete against a $26k new hybrid like the Prius LE. That prius is brand new, massively cheaper to repair and maintain, and will easily last you 10-12 years. Making that $140 a month an upside down prospect, given the fuel efficiency of the Prius.