• kerrigan778@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because products sold as non-psychoactive should generally actually be non-psychoactive. Though personally I appreciate it from the perspective of I’d like to be able to eat hemp protein without failing a drug test.

      • CM400@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        I feel you on that, but drug tests are bullshit anyway. Unless a test can reliably tell that you’re under the influence at work, they shouldn’t be able to use them.

        • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I mean, agreed, but I’m working for the DOT so… Not a lot I can do about that at least until it gets rescheduled. Hopefully if it gets rescheduled people can get a federally acknowledged prescription and the ADA should take care of the rest.

      • Today@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        If it were just about protecting the public, they would require a label of ingredients, which most items already have.

          • Today@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Most of the hemp I’ve bought included (or had available online) a certificate of analysis. With the rest, i knew what i was getting because it was labeled type 1, 2, or 3.

        • Today@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          No. Only ∆9 is limited. Per the farm bill, thca is hemp, so the same stuff you would buy at a dispensary can be legally purchased online and shipped to all but a handful of states. It’s all about the money.