• abbadon420@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If an incel becomes a family man, he isn’t an incel anymore. It’s part of the definition of incel. Also, they don’t have a better life for it, but a better life despite it (if they even have a better life, incels tend to sabotage their own happines). And you say we shouldn’t marginalise men,but it’s okay to marginalise women?

      • abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Basic human society. Hunters and gatherers did it too.

        People formed tribes to build a circle of trusted people, those outside the tribe were not trusted by default. It was a basic survivval technique. Tribesmen who broke the trust were kicked out. People who wanted to join the tribe had to prove their trustworthiness.

        Inclusivity people are a global tribe. You are not in the tribe because you have proven yourself not trustworthy. You cannot be trusted to treat all tribe members with respect. If you want to be back in the tribe, you will have to prove yourself.

        • NastyNative@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          For some one that is offended by 3 preferences and talks all this inclusivity. You are a hypocrite!

          • abbadon420@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Not at all. It is just that these two groups don’t go together. You are free to choose either. If you want to play with the other incels, that is fine. If you want to join the inclusivity group that is fine, you are welcome, that is the essence of inclusivity. But you cannot be in both.