MataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 21 hours agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square197fedilinkarrow-up1798arrow-down1126
arrow-up1672arrow-down1imageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netMataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 21 hours agomessage-square197fedilink
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down3·13 hours agoYeah, the environmental issues that are orders of magnitude less problematic than literally pumping the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere like with fossil fuels, vs comparatively miniscule amount of solid waste to store inert.
minus-squaremoitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoThe comparison is dumb. The subject was the comparaison, and not what type of energy is better for the environment. You’re interpreting.
minus-squareT156@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·10 hours agoCoal smoke is more radioactive than the outside of a fission reactor anyhow.
Yeah, the environmental issues that are orders of magnitude less problematic than literally pumping the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere like with fossil fuels, vs comparatively miniscule amount of solid waste to store inert.
The comparison is dumb. The subject was the comparaison, and not what type of energy is better for the environment.
You’re interpreting.
Coal smoke is more radioactive than the outside of a fission reactor anyhow.