• atro_city@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 minutes ago

        How is that “dehumanizing” when human is literally in the explanation. Had it been “female apeoid” I’d have agreed, but humanoid… So “moid” for male humanoid is “dehumanizing” too?

        • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          How is that “dehumanizing” when human is literally in the explanation. Had it been “female apeoid” I’d have agreed, but humanoid… So “moid” for male humanoid is “dehumanizing” too?

          “A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid

          A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.

    • SPRUNTnsfw@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think it’s supposed to be some kind of derogatory label for women, but is really just an identifier that the person using it is a worthless being whose opinion is as relevant as a gnats thoughts on the economy.