• BetaBlake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Oh looks it’s you again, just making all sorts of dumb statements all day long. Damn keep prepping those excuses for the next 4 years, you’re gonna be busy

        • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          If Russia wins, they will we see the mass murder from Bucha all over Ukraine. Since Russias war goal is to conquer all of Ukraine, we are going to see that on a much larger scale. For Ukraine that means defeat means death and fighting means probable death, but a chance of making it out alive. So Ukraine will fight to the end with or without aid.

          Russia is only going to negotiate, if it believes that victory is impossible, so making a deal is cheaper then continueing the fight. That is obvious, as Russia started the war itself. That is why sending aid is a good idea. If Russia believes that conquering all of Ukraine is too expensive, a deal becomes cheaper then continueing the war.

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              ceasefire in this case absolutely hurts ukraine… russia has manufacturing capability and time allows them to replenish their supplies. time does nothing to help ukraine, unless their foreign allies are manufacturing arms for them in the same way russia will be

              it’d be amazing to see an end to the war, but don’t kid yourself: a ceasefire gives russia an asymmetric advantage