This one is both upsetting and weird.
So there was a user on ponder.cat whoās been spamming posts. Like a lot. 58 per day, on average. Not 58 comments. 58 posts.
I started seeing a little scattering of reports about it, mostly just figured it was the modsā business to deal with, and then finally today I actually really took a look at what they were doing and realized it was way over the top. Pretty much everyone in the comments agreed when someone brought it up.
A 25 day old account with 1,400+ posts? What the actual fuck? My entire goddamn feed is this one accountā¦
Touch grass. Good lord. Youāre carpet bombing multiple communities with repeats of the same crap.
The user was not receptive.
lol.
I guess people here do not know how to block an account.
:)
Is that a compliment or a rant?
May I introduce you to Lemmy block function.
If you donāt like my posts then block me and you will never see them again. As simple as that.
Thatās a bunch of bullshit. The voting was about as you would expect. I said to the user:
Thatās not how it works. If youāre interfering with the average Lemmy userās experience, you donāt get to claim it doesnāt count because each individual person would be able to block each individual problematic account, if they wanted to have a good experience. Honestly, these people have a point. You have been posting an average of 58 posts per day. Thatās too much. I post a ton, and thatās about 10 times more than me, and Iāve gotten multiple complaints about posting too much in particular communities. The handful of times itās happened, my reaction was āOh my bad what sounds like an acceptable levelā and then to more or less stick to an acceptable level. Getting snarky with people who are asking you to cool it is very bad. Please stop posting so much. Anything about 10-15 posts per day starts to feel really excessive to me. Definitely donāt be dismissive about peopleās complaints to you about it.
They rejected my suggestion, so I sent them a DM that was a little more direct about it: Stop doing this if you want to keep your account on my instance.
Then, for some reason, they deleted their account on their own.
Well, that was weird, but at least itās all resolved and we can all get back to what we were doing. Or waitā¦ whatās happening now?
I wasnāt expecting āmaking sure we make a safe space for the spammers by banning people who complain about spamā to be an important moderation duty, but I guess in the bizarro world that is !news@lemmy.world moderation philosophy, it makes perfect sense.
This fails to at all explain why the block button would not have solved your problem with zero drama.
Youāre not a leader in that community? Petition the community and become one. Donāt want to be an agent of change? Join another community. There are so many outlets to getting this user out of your feed that donāt involve you posting comments of negative sentiment like you are some kind of guerilla police force.
Especially with a community as tended toward toxicity and slapfights as this one, I absolutely understand the motivation to preemptively remove threads that veer into the off topic than let them fester, especially if itās happening a lot.
YDI sorry :( next time I would make a meta thread or just block the offensive user.
The upvotes for this personās point of view were pretty much unanimous. Most people clearly didnāt see it as negativity. Also, reports of the original user for spamming or unreliable sources are pretty common. IDK how the !news@lemmy.world rules are written, but in most internet communities, spamming the feed with low-quality content in large quantities is a violation of how youāre supposed to do things.
Also, the slapfight was not removed. One side of it only was removed.
Doesnāt matter. If you make a meta petition thread next time you might have more luck. I donāt want to see flame wars enabled just because they get lots of upvotes. Make a petition post to ban users and raise awareness. Donāt put it in the comments.
If I had wanted to ban this user, I would have just done so, instead of talking about it. Theyāre on my instance (or were).
I think talking out issues is a good thing. A lot of people are capable of doing that without it becoming some kind of big debacle. We might have been going in the ābanā direction, if the conversation really remained at an impasse, but the only part of the whole event that really irritated me and led to the post was the least blameworthy user getting a two-week ban, and the spam staying up. Oh, and also my stuff getting deleted and the spam staying up. Bro WTF.
I know you and I have a difference of opinion on it, and thatās all good, but youāre not going to convince me that this user was not spamming, or that I need to respect the modās judgment about it when to me that judgement seems clearly not well-thought-out or credible.