:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(745x348:747x350)/anjela-borisova-urumova-040325-3462f4c95d5a4779ab0f3aedffc1b7d0.jpg)
Summary
Anjela Borisova Urumova, 20, received a 23-month prison sentence for falsely accusing Daniel Pierson of attempted rape and kidnapping in Pennsylvania, leading to his wrongful month-long incarceration.
Urumova pled guilty to seven misdemeanors, including filing false reports and fabricating evidence.
Investigators uncovered her lie after finding inconsistencies in surveillance footage. She admitted she targeted Pierson because she had seen him before.
Alongside jail time, she must pay $3,600 in restitution, undergo a mental health evaluation, and serve probation. Prosecutors warned the false claim damaged public trust and harmed real victims.
People like this should get the sentence of what they wrongly accused somebody for.
The motivation is what I really want to know. Given that it was just some random person, I can only hope she figured they’d never find him? So many crimes go unsolved, it’s surprising they found this random man with a truck— unless she actually remembered his license plate or something, but that would indicate it was a lot less random. Maybe this wasn’t as random as she’s saying, maybe she got in a road rage incident with him…
I guess it’s because I’m not the kind of person who’d do this, but I just don’t understand why someone would. If you want the social media “clout,” presumably for a gofundme or something, you don’t need to go to the police about it. Even if you thought you had to, a super vague report would probably lead to a cold case that would waste everyone’s time, but at least no one would go to jail. If you were truly mentally ill and delusional, you probably wouldn’t admit even to yourself that it didn’t happen.
No mention of motivation. I don’t understand why anyone would choose a random person to just utterly destroy like that. Like even though he’s been found innocent can you imagine the horror of being told you were accused of that?
Anyone read more elsewhere?
Women can be surprisingly vindictive. I’ve been fired from a job before because a woman there did not like me and just made up a sexual assault allegation against me. I never even touched her and I definitely did not have any intentions towards her but that did not matter because the company had a zero tolerance policy. They did not even care to hear my side of the story, they just fired me on the spot without recourse.
To this day I have no idea what I did that might have pissed her off so much she’d want to destroy my livelihood. She was married AND pregnant and as much of a dirtbag as I might be, I would never even dream of hitting on someone like that.
Nearly two years in prison for falsely accusing someone but if that innocent man got a sentence it would have been 20 plus years…
Yes. It should have been at least a few more years in prison and a felony rap too.
If the person she accused was convicted she would have ruined his life. Ending up on a sex offenders registry would have basically cut him off from social media and the internet. He wouldn’t have been able to get many jobs and he wouldn’t be allowed to live anywhere close to children. That could mean SO much. I don’t even think you’re allow3d to have a smart phone in some cases from what I’ve read. He would have gone to jail and then after he got out he would ha e been cut off from the modern world.
And if a non-innocent rape the man would get community service.
Only if he’s young and talented
Or affluent (za)
The court press release said she was sentenced to “45 days to 23 months” and the linked news article garbled that to “23 months and 45 days” which they somehow added up to “nearly 2 years”. No idea why the sentence itself has such a wide range.
Usually ours to account for things like good behavior/parole I think? I always assumed they used that upper range as the stick part of the incentive to not fuck up again once you’re out of prison since getting sent back would make you serve the longest possible sentence.
could be, or more likely in my mind it’s just an ai fuckup.
How the hell do you get from “I saw his truck” to “he tried to kidnap and rape me”
She should get what he would have gotten had he been convicted of her lie.
I’m glad she got charged at all, but what a weak sentence.
Those are some dead/crazy eyes…yikes
Ugh, not nearly enough of a sentence.
23 months and 45 days? Is there any reasoning behind this depiction of the length of the hail time or is this just an error?
The cited source says she was sentenced to “45 days to 23 months” so error
Often with non-violent crimes like this, the sentencing is determined formulaically. It’s pretty common for the judge to just go with whatever the legislature-recommend sentencing states. X charge = Y days, and you just add up all the Y’s.
This is a violent crime, restriction of someone’s freedom is a type of violence, but apparently if you get the government to do it for you it stops being violence.
Helps that the system wants to put people so much behind bars that no evidence is needed other than a finger pointing.
He was jailed for a month
In this context, ‘non-violent’ has a technical meaning. So we don’t need to play word games with it. As for putting people behind bars without no evidence, that’s not a thing that happens in rape or kidnapping cases. And in this case, the false accuser in the one going to prison.
Probably just the way multiple sentences easily added up and the writer didn’t bother to convert for consistency. X months for one crime, Y days for that crime, etc.
Removed by mod
Good news. Terrible emotional comment section.
