not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Be Wholesome@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoomglemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square118linkfedilinkarrow-up1938arrow-down129
arrow-up1909arrow-down1imageomglemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Be Wholesome@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square118linkfedilink
minus-squarelumpenproletariat@quokk.auBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down26·1 year agoDecent for a pope isn’t saying much when he wasn’t decent as a person. Homophobic slur using piece of shit he was behind closed doors.
minus-squarebobtimus_prime@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoHow do you know this? Or do you just assume?
minus-squarelumpenproletariat@quokk.auBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down2·1 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareSonor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down1·1 year agoThe article says he might not have realised the word he used was derogatory. Just for context, for the tl:dr crowd
minus-squareqaz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year agoYes and then he apologized and then did it again a couple weeks later
minus-squarelumpenproletariat@quokk.auBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarelumpenproletariat@quokk.auBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoWhich is an assumption.
Decent for a pope isn’t saying much when he wasn’t decent as a person. Homophobic slur using piece of shit he was behind closed doors.
How do you know this? Or do you just assume?
Removed by mod
The article says he might not have realised the word he used was derogatory. Just for context, for the tl:dr crowd
Yes and then he apologized and then did it again a couple weeks later
Removed by mod
Which is an assumption.