seaQueue@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 年前ADUHD rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square58linkfedilinkarrow-up11.03Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1imageADUHD rulelemmy.worldseaQueue@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 年前message-square58linkfedilink
minus-squareDa Bald Eagul@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 年前I have a 4k60 LCD monitor, which is fine, right? It’s not 144, but good enough.
minus-squareSamboT@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 年前Typically one chooses/compromises between high resolution and high frame rate. 4k60 is one way to go.
minus-squareDa Bald Eagul@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 年前Doesn’t mean 60hz is suddenly “trash”, as the commenter said.
minus-squareSamboT@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 年前Nope I would say whatever you are drawn to is the best choice. But some people play fast paced games that benefit from higher frame rate and it is noticeable when you see a 60hz monitor afterwards.
minus-squareSnipingNinja@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 年前My laptop is LCD and has 165 Hz refresh rate, although the resolution is QHD and not 4k
I have a 4k60 LCD monitor, which is fine, right? It’s not 144, but good enough.
Typically one chooses/compromises between high resolution and high frame rate. 4k60 is one way to go.
Doesn’t mean 60hz is suddenly “trash”, as the commenter said.
Nope I would say whatever you are drawn to is the best choice.
But some people play fast paced games that benefit from higher frame rate and it is noticeable when you see a 60hz monitor afterwards.
My laptop is LCD and has 165 Hz refresh rate, although the resolution is QHD and not 4k