To be clear: I prefer to pay for things instead of having to see ads but 13€ / month!? For a meta product that has inherently user-hostile design patterns even without ads?
Who does this appeal to?
To be clear: I prefer to pay for things instead of having to see ads but 13€ / month!? For a meta product that has inherently user-hostile design patterns even without ads?
Who does this appeal to?
It does. As long as there is an alternative in the form of a subscription, they can offer a “free” tier like that
It’s not as clear cut as either of us thinks… To my surprise the Dutch seem to agree with you. But case law is being made as we speak https://consent.guide/cookie-or-pay-walls/