• Simpsonator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    I think you’re getting down voted for two reasons.

    1. OP’s comment didn’t state anything factual. It was rude to accuse him of attempting to “propagate incorrect information.”

    2. You’re lumping together two very different types of spending and it feels like you’re making a disingenuous argument. The vast majority of spending you’re talking about is Social Security/Medicare which has received near constant increases. Welfare programs on the other hand have been under attack since the 90s. I can say that Social Security, Medicare, and the FAA together make up almost half the budget but it doesn’t make a good argument for cutting the FAA.

    All that said, I do think you make a good point that there’s other programs to look at. Maybe we can cut the military budget while also looking at saving money on Medicare.

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      I didn’t call it a lie because I don’t think it’s an issue of will or intent, so I didn’t mean it to be insulting. I see where you’re coming from otherwise, but this isn’t a comment made from nowhere. This is a common talking point people try to use and I genuinely think it reinforces the trope.

      I don’t think it’s disingenuous at all. Whether it’s for a single mother or a pensioner it’s certainly not being used for useless bases or bombs.

      I don’t believe we can solve problems if we don’t understand them and our lack of understanding is disastrous when it comes to voting.