Most people turned to congratulate Chelsea for the fascinating game, but indeed Manchester City has a few advantages over key decisions. The most apparent controversies were the soft penalty awarded again, and no foul for the handball. Sadly if the standard of refereeing is normal, Chelsea should deserve a win.

  • TheEgyptianScouser@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    City had the same penalty for two weeks in a row while no one else in the league got that penalty even though it happens every game Jota did the same thing twice against Brentford and nothing happened

    Tbh I just think there’s corruption going on but I can only point fingers

    • BogosiGaborone@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So Cucurella should get away with manhandled players in the box. He also held Rodri for the first Chelsea goal, otherwise he was odds on to get to the ball before Silva

      • NotADoctorSshh@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        if Rodri would have thrown himself at the ground VAR would 100% take a look at it… and I think I’d known the decision they would take

    • BogosiGaborone@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So Cucurella should get away with manhandling players in the box. He also held Rodri for the first Chelsea goal, otherwise he was odds on to get to the ball before Silva