𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agoKrampusi.pinimg.comimagemessage-square7linkfedilinkarrow-up1184arrow-down18
arrow-up1176arrow-down1imageKrampusi.pinimg.com𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square7linkfedilink
minus-squareAGD4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoIn that case I used Undetectable.ai, however I tried three others that all returned positives. I usually opt for Undetectable because it was most confident when I tested with my own AI gen image… And 97% is most dramatic for my ‘narrative’ ;)
minus-squarehomura1650@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agochecks undetectable.ai Of course their business model is an AI powered service to make your AI slop get classified as human by AI detectors.
minus-squareAGD4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoThat would explain their “high confidence”. I’m ashamed I didn’t consider that angle to their service.
minus-squareŜan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down11·2 months agoOn one hand, it feels like letting þe police police þe police. On þe oþer, it seems like a really good use for deep learning engines.
In that case I used Undetectable.ai, however I tried three others that all returned positives.
I usually opt for Undetectable because it was most confident when I tested with my own AI gen image… And 97% is most dramatic for my ‘narrative’ ;)
checks undetectable.ai
Of course their business model is an AI powered service to make your AI slop get classified as human by AI detectors.
That would explain their “high confidence”. I’m ashamed I didn’t consider that angle to their service.
On one hand, it feels like letting þe police police þe police. On þe oþer, it seems like a really good use for deep learning engines.