These absolute dipshits still seem confused about the purpose here. The issue has been decided, this is all just to determine damages. There’s nothing to be ‘won’ here but reduced damages, and antagonizing the guy who decides how much they’re going to be is what I think they would call a novel strategy.
They obviously will not get a mistrial, but as the summary judgement was a part of the trial, if they were granted a mistrial, they’d also get a second chance at that part.
These absolute dipshits still seem confused about the purpose here. The issue has been decided, this is all just to determine damages. There’s nothing to be ‘won’ here but reduced damages, and antagonizing the guy who decides how much they’re going to be is what I think they would call a novel strategy.
deleted by creator
I myself am all set. I bought my crazy amounts of stuff years ago.
They obviously will not get a mistrial, but as the summary judgement was a part of the trial, if they were granted a mistrial, they’d also get a second chance at that part.