A 10 point deduction for losses exceeding allowable losses by 19.5M related to stadium expenses… Seems fair, doesn’t it. We broke the rules, but we could’ve just said f*ck the rules and had much more losses, but instead we sold Richy and others for half of what we could’ve to try and mitigate losses.
If this doesn’t get reduced to at most a 6 point deduction I will be absolutely furious
Yeah but he was never a 120million player. He was decent for you but come on, that would have made him the most valuable transfer in prem history at the time, by a fairly large margin
A 10 point deduction for losses exceeding allowable losses by 19.5M related to stadium expenses… Seems fair, doesn’t it. We broke the rules, but we could’ve just said f*ck the rules and had much more losses, but instead we sold Richy and others for half of what we could’ve to try and mitigate losses.
If this doesn’t get reduced to at most a 6 point deduction I will be absolutely furious
I think you miss the point here
You absolutely could not have sold richarlison for double what u got. U already robbed spurs blind at 60million
It’s not what he’s worth to spurs, it’s what he was worth to us
Yeah but he was never a 120million player. He was decent for you but come on, that would have made him the most valuable transfer in prem history at the time, by a fairly large margin
Oh no, not saying that. Certainly not a £120m player, but absolutely a £60m player in terms of his value to us