Rumors are that Wenger’s offsides rule will go into effect in the next year. The rule is basically that the offsides line will now be dependent on the last body part being in line with a defender rather than the first body part being past the defender. I personally think this will result in teams parking the bus so that they limit the speed aspect of the forwards. It will be so much more difficult to pull and offsides trap with this rule set. I also think VAR will butcher this for the next few seasons.

So anyways, what rule would you implement or remove if you had the options to? I have two:

Throws-ins: don’t require one foot to be on the ground or the ball to go cleanly behind the head. Two hands on the ball and throw it in, however. you want, that’s it. Granny style? Go for it.

PK’s: Have the players line up ten yards behind the 18 and once the whistle is blown they can go after the ball. This would illuminate the weird runs up to the ball or the final jump kick, which is almost a cheat code against goalies. I’m a united fan so this would of course impact Bruno but I think think it makes sense. The attacker still has the advantage being that it’s a PK but also adds a bit of extra pressure. Shootouts would be so much more involved.

What rule changes can you think of?

  • kliq-klaq-@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    If we are keeping the slightly mad interpretation of handball then shifting it to an indirect freekick in the penalty area unless there is a clear denial of a goal or goalscoring opportunity.

    • YungMarxBans@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is much more radical, but I’d be in favor of direct free kicks at the location of the foul in the penalty area.

      Penalties being given for a tackle at the side edge of the box doesn’t feel fair because it’s such a huge incentive to dive.

    • YungMarxBans@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is much more radical, but I’d be in favor of direct free kicks at the location of the foul in the penalty area.

      Penalties being given for a tackle at the side edge of the box doesn’t feel fair because it’s such a huge incentive to dive.

    • AcesAgainstKings@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Been saying this for years. I’d make all contact of the arm/hand with the ball an indirect free-kick and leave the interpretation of a penalty down to whether it was DOGSO or not.